Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 239-311-3 | CAS number: 15267-95-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 154.7 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: substance specific (see discussion)
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 11.2
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 806 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 1 733 mg/m³
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose descriptor starting point is based on a NOAEC.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- sub-chronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- AF not used for inhalation route
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 2.2
- Justification:
- substance specific (see discussion)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The DNEL is based on a high quality study.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 22.33 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: substance specific (see discussion)
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 11.2
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 806 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 250.1 mg/kg bw/day
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The dose descriptor starting point is based on a NOAEL.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- sub-chronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- substance specific (see discussion)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- remaining differences
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 2.2
- Justification:
- substance specific (see discussion)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- The DNEL is based on a high quality study.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- sensitisation (skin)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
There are no studies available for the registered substance (chloromethyl)triethoxysilane (CAS 15267-95-5). However, reliable data are available for the structural analogue substances (3-chloropropyl)trimethoxysilane (CAS 2530-87-2) and (3-chloropropyl)triethoxysilane (CAS 5089-70-3).
Effects on prenatal developmental toxicity after repeated oral administration of the analogue substance (3-chloropropyl)triethoxysilane (CAS 5089-70-3) was investigated in the available key study (BSL, 2014) conducted according to OECD 414, and in compliance with GLP.
Groups of 24 pregnant female Crl: WI(Han) rats per dose were administered doses of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day via oral gavage. Animals treated with the vehicle (corn oil) served as controls. Treatment was carried out once daily during the gestation period between day 5 to day 19. Animals were observed for mortalities and clinical signs, and detailed clinical observations were performed twice daily (except weekends). Body weights and food consumption was recorded. Upon sacrifice on gestation day 20 macroscopic examination for structural abnormalities or pathological changes were performed. Fetuses were subjected to external and either, soft tissue or, skeletal and head examination. In summary, administration of (3-chloropropyl)triethoxysilane (CAS 5089-70-3) at doses of 0, 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day by oral gavage to pregnant female Wistar rats from gestation days 5 to 19 resulted in lower body weight, body weight gain and food consumption at 1000 mg/kg bw/day. Lower terminal body weight, uterus weight and mean total litter weight were also noted at this dose. Increased incidences of skeletal findings such as delayed ossification and lower litter weight recorded at 1000 mg/kg bw/day were considered to be attributable to the maternal effects and not adverse. An increased incidence of wavy ribs and bent scapula was also noted at this dose and these findings are recognized as part of chondrodystrophy syndrome in rats and have been demonstrated to be post-natally reversible and therefore also not adverse. Therefore the maternal and fetal No-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Levels (NOAEL) were both considered to be 300 mg/kg bw/day.
In the available key repeated-dose inhalation study (Dow Corning Corporation, 1993), conducted according to OECD 413 and in compliance with GLP, groups of 10 Sprague-Dawley rats per sex were exposed to the test item (3-chloropropyl)trimethoxysilane (CAS 2530-87-2) in a whole-body inhalation system at target concentrations of 0.5, 5, and 100 ppm for 6 hours/day, 5 days/week. After 13 weeks of exposure, rats were sacrificed and examined for changes in blood, serum chemistry, urine, organ weights and gross and histopathology. Microscopic examinations at study termination did not reveal any adverse relevant findings of toxicological concern in any dose group. Therefore, the NOAEC was set at 100 ppm (nominal concentration, corresponding to an actual overall mean exposure concentration of 99 ppm).
A supporting study is available for the structural analogue substance (3-chloropropyl)trimethoxysilane (CAS 2530-87-2). The study was conducted according to OECD 422, and in compliance with GLP (RCC, 2005). Groups of 10 Sprague-Dawley rats per sex per dose were exposed to the vapour in a whole body inhalation system at doses of 5, 25 and 100 ppm. Untreated animals served as controls. Treatment was carried out for 6 hours daily to male rats for 28 days and to female rats throughout the 14-day pre-pairing, pairing and gestation period until the individual day 19 post coitum. During the pairing period, rats were housed overnight with one male and one female in Makrolon pairing cages. The female was placed with the same male until mating occurred or two weeks elapsed. Animals were observed for mortalities and clinical signs, and detailed clinical observations were performed once per week. A functional observational battery (modified Irwin screen test) was performed once during the test (males: shortly before sacrifice; females: on day 3 post-partum). Body weights and food consumption was recorded. Parental generation males were sacrificed after they had been treated for 28 days, parental generation females were sacrificed on day 4 post-partum. A complete gross necropsy was performed on all adult animals. The litters were examined for litter size, live birth, stillbirth and any gross anomalies. The sex ratio of the pups was recorded. Pups were weighed individually on day 0, 1 and 4 post-partum. The pups were observed daily for survival and behavioural abnormalities in nesting and nursing. Dead pups and pups killed on day 4 post-partum were examined macroscopically. No test item-related effects were observed in the parental animals, including no alteration of mating behaviour and fertility. Additionally, no treatment-related effects on the litters were observed. Based on the absence of any findings the NOAEC for repeated dose toxicity, fertility, and developmental toxicity/teratogenicity was set at 100 ppm (nominal concentration, corresponding to 99.7 ppm mean analytical concentration).
Both available studies via the inhalation route resulted in a NOAEC of 100 ppm nominal vapour concentration (highest dose tested). In the pre-natal developmental study via the oral route with (3-chloropropyl)triethoxysilane (CAS 5089-70-3) maternal toxicity was observed as reduced food consumption, which consequently lead to reduced body weight gains. Furthermore, the skeletal variations observed in the fetuses plus the reduced fetal body weights gains are considered to be attributable to the material toxicity observed. An increased incidence of wavy ribs and bent scapula was also noted at the top dose of 1000 mg/kg bw but these findings are recognized as part of chondrodystrophy syndrome in rats and have been demonstrated to be post-natally reversible and therefore also not adverse. Hence, the result of the inhalation study according to OECD 413 with the longest study duration will be used for the hazard assessment of the registered substance. Thus, a NOAEC of 99 ppm as actual overall mean exposure concentration will be deduced, corresponding to 806 mg/m³. The molecular weight ratio of the submission substance (CAS 15267-95-5) and the test substance (CAS 2530-87-2) is: 212 g/mol/198.72 g/mol=1.07. Therefore, the NOAEC for the submission substance is: 806 mg/m³x1.07= 862 mg/m³.
Short-term high exposures are considered unlikely given the high levels of control in place at sites producing and using the substance. DNELs for long-term exposure are therefore adequate to protect against short-term exposures and no separate short-term DNELs are calculated.
The long-term DNEL for systemic effects via the inhalation routeis determined on the basis of the 90-day inhalation NOAEC for the structural analogue substance (3-chloropropyl)trimethoxysilane (CAS 2530-87-2): 806 mg/m³; exposure duration: 6 h/d, 5 days/week. The following corrections were made:
Correction for lower human breathing rate: 4
Correction for experimental vs. occupational exposure duration: 6 h/8 h
Correction for respiratory volume (worker, light physical activity): 6.7 m³/10 m³
The molecular weight difference between target and source chemical is 212 g/mol/198.72 g/mol=1.07
Therefore the corrected NOAEC for long-term systemic effects via the inhalation route is:
806 mg/m³ x 4 x (6 h/8 h) x (6.7 m³/10 m³) x 1.07=1733 mg/m³
The following assessment factors were applied to the corrected NOAEC:
Exposure duration (sub-chronic to chronic): 2 (default)
Interspecies differences (toxicodynamics): 2.5 (default)
Interspecies differences (toxicokinetics, rat/human): 1 (substance specific, see below)
Intraspecies differences (toxicodynamics, worker): 2.24 (√5) (substance specific, see below)
Intraspecies differences (toxicokinetics, worker): 1 (substance specific, see below)
Overall Assessment Factor:11.20
The overall DNEL (repeated-dose – systemic – inhalation - worker) is therefore:
1733 mg/m³/11.20 =154.7 mg/m³.
The long-term DNEL for systemic effects via the dermal route is determined on the basis of route-to-route extrapolation from the NOAEC for the structural analogue substance (3-chloropropyl)trimethoxysilane (CAS 2530 -87 -2) (806 mg/m³) from a 90-day inhalation study in rats (exposure duration: 6 h/d, 5 d/week). The following corrections were made:
Correction for respiratory volume: 0.29 m³/kg bw/day (rat, 6 h)
Correction for route to route extrapolation (relative absorption inhalation vs. dermal): 1
The molecular weight difference between target and source chemical is 212 g/mol/198.72 g/mol=1.07
The corrected NOAEL (dermal) is therefore:
806 mg/m³ x 0.29 m³/kg bw/day x 1 x 1.07 = 250.1 mg/kg bw/day
The following assessment factors were applied to the corrected NOAEL:
Exposure duration (sub-chronic to chronic): 2 (default)
Interspecies differences (toxicodynamics): 2.5 (default)
Interspecies differences (toxicokinetics, rat/human): 1 (substance specific, see below)
Intraspecies differences (toxicodynamics, worker): 2.24 (√5) (substance specific, see below)
Intraspecies differences (toxicokinetics, worker): 1 (substance specific, see below)
Overall Assessment Factor: 11.20
The overall DNEL (repeated-dose – systemic – dermal - worker) is therefore:
250.1 mg/kg bw/day/11.20 = 22.33 mg/kg bw/day.
Allometric scaling factor (Toxicokinetics)
The allometric scaling factor accounts for metabolic differences between the test species and humans based on the caloric demand of the relevant species. The rat is thereby thought to have the ability for a faster detoxification by metabolic and excretion processes. On the other hand, any metabolism leading to more toxic molecules makes the rat more susceptible. The default allometric scaling factor is not considered to be relevant for (chloromethyl)triethoxysilane on the following grounds:
1. The silanol hydrolysis product of the substance (and many other related substances) shows no biodegradation in a ready biodegradation test other than can be accounted for by degradation of non-silanol hydrolysis products (PFA, 2013f); this suggests that the substance and its silanol hydrolysis product are not recognised by biological systems containing all the mammalian enzymes and metabolic systems.
2. Hydrolysis of the ethoxy groups is seen as the major, rate determining step in detoxification as the resulting silanols have an increased urinary clearance based on the decreased molecular weight and the increased water solubility and have only a low tendency to migrate into potential target cells. Subsequent enzymatic metabolism steps are unlikely and would be of limited relevance for a rapid excretion of the substance.
3. Differences in excretion may also scale according to the allometric principle. However, for a small water soluble molecule with a strong affinity to aqueous compartments and without indications for specific organ toxicity, the role of the excretion step is seen as minimal.
4. Toxicokinetic arguments (see also Section 5.1) show that the silanol hydrolysis product has low log Kow and hence low uptake, rapid excretion via urine, which would be true in all mammals, with minimal interspecies differences.
Conclusion
Higher enzyme expression levels, stronger inducibility, higher substrate affinities and co-factor levels are factors that are potentially in favour of a more rapid xenobiotic metabolism, including elimination, by rodents compared to humans. Enzymes are not involved in the abiotic hydrolysis of the alkoxysilanes, and the silanols are rapidly excreted as such without prior enzymatic conjugation. This knowledge eliminates the major deal of the uncertainty on toxicokinetic interspecies differences. Since the metabolism of (chloromethyl)triethoxysilane by humans and rats does not involve enzymes, the interspecies toxicokinetic differences are reduced from 4.0 to 1.0. Likewise, there is no basis for intra-human variability of the hydrolysis step. The default intraspecies factor of 10 or 5 for consumers and workers, respectively, is reduced to 100.5and 50.5, respectively, according to the Renwick approach (Renwick et al., 2005). Only the toxicodynamic differences remain to be considered.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.