Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Hydrolysis

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
hydrolysis
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
13 March - 15 May, 2007
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Study has been performed according to OECD and/or EU guidelines and according to GLP principles.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.7 (Degradation: Abiotic Degradation: Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Radiolabelling:
no
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
The concentration of the test substance in the test samples was determined immediately after preparation (t=0), after 2.4 hours and after 5 days. The samples taken at t > 0 were cooled to room temperature using running tap water.
Buffers:
Acetate buffer pH 4: solution of 16.6% 0.05 M sodium acetate and 83.4% 0.05 M acetic acid.
Phosphate buffer pH 7: solution of 0.05 M potassium dihydrogenphosphate adjusted to pH 7 using 1 N sodium hydroxide.
Borate buffer pH 9: solution of 0.05 M boric acid and 0.05 M potassium chloride adjusted to pH 9 using 1 N sodium hydroxide.

Details on test conditions:
Test substance solutions were prepared in the buffer solutions at a nominal concentration between 662 - 748 mg/l. The solutions were filter-sterilised through a 0.2 µm membrane filter and transferred into sterile glass vessels. To exclude oxygen, nitrogen gas was purged through the solutions for 5 minutes. Each vessel was sealed and placed in a thermostatically controlled water bath at 50.0°C +/- 0.1°C.

Duration:
5 d
Temp.:
50 °C
Positive controls:
no
Negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
blank buffer solution
Preliminary study:
The result for the samples taken at t=0 hours and t=2.4 hours indicated that there was a spread on the results. Because neither improvement of the method nor development of a more accurate method is possible, it was decided to analyse t=5 days samples in triplicate.
Transformation products:
not measured
% Recovery:
97
pH:
4
Temp.:
50 °C
Duration:
5 d
% Recovery:
108
pH:
7
Temp.:
50 °C
Duration:
5 d
% Recovery:
94
pH:
9
Temp.:
50 °C
Duration:
5 d
pH:
4
Temp.:
25 °C
DT50:
> 1 yr
Key result
pH:
7
Temp.:
25 °C
DT50:
> 1 yr
pH:
9
Temp.:
25 °C
DT50:
> 1 yr
Details on results:
At pH 4, pH 7 and pH 9, a decrease in concentration < 10% was observed after 5 days. It demonstrates that the half-life time of the test substance at 25°C > 1 year which is as expected based on the chemical structure of the test substance. According to the guideline, no further tests were required.
Validity criteria fulfilled:
not applicable
Conclusions:
Ditetrahydrofurylpropane is hydrolytically stable.

Description of key information

A test was conducted according to EU method C.7. At pH 4, pH 7 and pH 9, a decrease in concentration < 10% was observed after 5 days. It demonstrates that the half-life time of the test substance at 25°C > 1 year which is as expected based on the chemical structure of the test substance.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

Ditetrahydrofurylpropane is hydrolytically stable at pH 4, 7 and 9. The half-life time at 25°C is > 1 year for pH 4, 7 and 9.