Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 607-234-8 | CAS number: 234446-82-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
1. Hypothesis for the analogue approach
In accordance with Article 13 (1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, "information on intrinsic properties of substances may be generated by means other than tests, provided that the conditions set out in Annex XI are met.” In particular for human toxicity, information shall be generated whenever possible by means other than vertebrate animal tests, which includes the use of information from structurally related substances (grouping or read-across). In this case the related substances mentioned below are ingredients ofMagnesium, EDTA cobalt copper iron manganese zinc complexes(CAS 234446-82-3).
Having regard to the general rules for grouping of substances and read-across approach laid down in Annex XI, Item 1.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 whereby substances may be predicted as similar provided that their physicochemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological properties are likely to be similar or follow a regular pattern as a result of structural similarity.
Target Substance
Source Substance No 1
Source Substance No 2
Name
Magnesium, EDTA cobalt copper iron manganese zinc complexes
EDTA-FeNa
EDTA-CuNa2
CAS
234446-82-3
15708-41-5
14025-15-1
Sensitization
--
Not sensitizing
Not sensitizing
Lack of data for a given endpoint is indicated by “--“.
2. Analogue approach justification
The above mentioned substances are considered to be similar on the basis of structural similarity resulting in similar properties and/or activities. The available endpoint information of the source substances are used to predict the respective endpoints forMagnesium, EDTA cobalt copper iron manganese zinc complexes(CAS 234446-82-3).
Since no studies are available forMagnesium, EDTA cobalt copper iron manganese zinc complexes(CAS 234446-82-3) investigating the skin sensitization,a read-across from the structurally related source substancesEDTA-FeNa (CAS 15708-41-5) and EDTA-CuNa2 (CAS 14025-15-1) was usedin accordance to Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 Annex XI, 1.5.
3. Results
a. Target Substance:EDTA cobalt copper iron manganese zinc complexes(CAS 234446-82-3)
There were no studies available with the target substance for skin sensitization.
b. Source substances
- Source Substance No1: EDTA-FeNa (CAS 15708-41-5)
In a local lymph node assay according to OECD guideline 426 the skin sensitization potential of EDTA-FeNa was evaluated (Haferkorn, 2007).Three concentrations of EDTA-FeNa (10%, 25% and 50%, w/w) dissolved inacetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)were tested on the dorsum of each ear on 3 consecutive days in six female CBA mice per group and compared to a vehicle control group.On test day 4 lymph node cell count, ear weight (punch biopsies), ear swelling and weight of the lymph nodes were measured.
The stimulation indices of lymph node cell count and ear weight were 1.5 and 1.2, respectively.
EDTA-FeNa was considered not to be sensitizing.
- Source Substance No2: EDTA-CuNa2 (CAS 14025-15-1)
The skin sensitizing potential of EDTA-CuNa2 was assessed in a murine local lymphnode assay according to OECD guideline No 429 (Otterdijk et al, 2013). Three experimental groups of five female CBA/J mice were treated with test substance concentrations of 10, 25 or 50% w/w on three consecutive days, by open application on the ears. Five vehicle control animals were similarly treated, but with vehicle alone (1% watery pluronic L92).No irritation of the ears was observed in any of the animals examined.White/grey test substance remnant were present on the dorsal surface of the ears of all animals at 10, 25 and 50% on Days 1-3, and at 50% also on Day 4 for one animal, which did not hamper scoring of skin reactions.
All auricular lymph nodes of the animals of the experimental and control groups were considered normal in size. No macroscopic abnormalities of the surrounding area were noted in any of the animals. The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 10, 25 and 50% were 0.9, 1.1 and 1.2 respectively.Since there was no indication that the test substance elicited an SI≥3 when tested up to 50%, EDTA-CuNa2 was considered not to be a skin sensitizer.
Key study assignment:
There is no information according the sensitizing potential available for the target substanceMagnesium, EDTA cobalt copper iron manganese zinc complexes. In a weight of evidence approach the sensitizing potential of the target substance was assessed via studies from two different source substances (Otterdijk, 2013 & Haferkorn, 2007), which are ingredients of the target substance. Those studies, are well documented, reliable and reveal a consistent negative result.
Conclusion
The source substancesEDTA-FeNa (CAS 15708-41-5) and EDTA-CuNa2 (CAS 14025-15-1) revealed negative results in guideline-conform studies andwould not be regarded as a skin sensitizer according to the recommendations made in the test guidelines. Both source substances are ingredients of the target substance. It is not expected that other components of the target substance induce sensitization.
In conclusion, the available data on sensitization with structurally relatedsubstances, the target substance EDTA cobalt copper iron manganese zinc complexes(CAS 234446-82-3) is not considered to be a skin sensitizer.
Migrated from Short description of key information:
LLNA, OECD No 429, not sensitizing (Haferkorn, 2007& Otterdijk, 2013)
Justification for selection of skin sensitisation endpoint:
Weight of evidence approach with ingredients of the target substance.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Justification for classification
According to GHS (CLP-Regulation (EU) 1272/2008) and according to DSD-regulation (67/548/EEC) classification of the target substanceEDTA cobalt copper iron manganese zinc complexes(CAS 234446-82-3) as skin sensitizer is not warranted.
Labelling skin/respiratory sensitization:
GHS: no classification
DSD: no classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.