Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The protocoll used was the basis of the OECD Guideline 429 LLNA. However, it is a probably a non-GLP study with minor deviations to the OECD Guideline
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
other:

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Structure activity relationships in skin sensitization using the murine local lymph node assay
Author:
J. Ashby, D.A. Basketter, D. Paton, I. Kimber
Year:
1995
Bibliographic source:
Toxicology, 103, 177-194
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
ICCVAM Evaluation of the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay
Author:
Karen E. Haneke, Raymond R. Tice, Bonnie L. Carson, Barry H. Margolin and William S. Stokes
Year:
2001
Bibliographic source:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 34, 274-286

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
minor
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method was according to Kimber and Basketter 1992
GLP compliance:
not specified
Remarks:
probably non-GLP
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Nonanoyl chloride
EC Number:
212-131-2
EC Name:
Nonanoyl chloride
Cas Number:
764-85-2
IUPAC Name:
nonanoyl chloride
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
Palmitoyl chloride
EC Number:
203-996-7
EC Name:
Palmitoyl chloride
Cas Number:
112-67-4
IUPAC Name:
hexadecanoyl chloride
Constituent 3
Reference substance name:
Stearoyl chloride
EC Number:
204-004-5
EC Name:
Stearoyl chloride
Cas Number:
112-76-5
IUPAC Name:
octadecanoyl chloride
Details on test material:
Nonanoyl chloride, CAS 764-85-2;
Palmitoyl chloride (= Hexadecanoyl chloride), CAS 112-67-4;
Stearoyl chloride (= Octadecanoyl chloride), CAS 112-76-5

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
no details given

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
5, 10, 25 %
No. of animals per dose:
not reported
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
no details reported


MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: LLNA
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: a stimulation index ≥ 3, together with consideration of dose-response


TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
Groups of mice are exposed daily, for 3 consecutive days, to various concentrations of the test chemical or to the relevant vehicle alone, on the dorsum of both ears. Subsequently on 5 days following the initiation of exposure, mice are injected intravenously with [3H]thymidine and activity measured as a function of isotope incorporation in draining auricular lymph nodes (Kimber and Basketter, 1992).
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: see table below
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: not reported

Any other information on results incl. tables

 Name  CAS NR  Vehicle  % Concentration  T/C Ratio (Stimulation Index)
 Nonanoyl Chloride  764 -85 -2  AOO  5, 10, 25  12.7, 19.4, 20.9
 Hexadecanoyl Chloride  112 -67 -4  AOO  5, 10, 25  2.1, 3.3, 4.5
 Octadecanoyl Chloride  112 -76 -5  AOO  5, 10, 25  3.8, 4.5, 4.0

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Executive summary:
Groups of mice are exposed daily, for 3 consecutive days, to various concentrations of the test chemical or to the relevant vehicle alone, on the dorsum of both ears. On day 5 following the initiation of exposure, mice are injected intravenously with [3H]thymidine and activity measured as a function of isotope incorporation in draining auricular lymph nodes (Kimber and Basketter, 1992). A stimulation index ≥ 3 was observed in all concentration for Nonanoyl chloride and Octadecanoyl chloride. For Hexadecanoyl chloride a SI ≥ 3 was observed for the concentrations 10% and 25%. Therefore, Nonanoyl chloride, Hexadecanoyl chloride and Octadecanoyl chloride are regarded as sensitizing in the LLNA. Due to structural similarities, Lauroyl chloride is also regarded as a skin sensitizer.