Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Explosiveness

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
explosive properties of explosives
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2009-12-08 - 2009-12-09
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.14 (Explosive properties)
GLP compliance:
not specified
Key result
Parameter:
sensitiveness to impact: impact energy (J)
Value:
40
Remarks on result:
not sensitive to impact using an impact energy of 40 J
Key result
Parameter:
sensitiveness to friction: friction load (N)
Value:
360
Remarks on result:
not sensitive to friction using a friction load of 360 N
Key result
Parameter:
thermal sensitivity - Koenen test: diameter of the orifice plate
Value:
6
Number of fragments:
0
Remarks on result:
not thermal sensitive if heated under defined confinement
Key result
Parameter:
thermal sensitivity - Koenen test: diameter of the orifice plate
Value:
2
Number of fragments:
0
Remarks on result:
not thermal sensitive if heated under defined confinement

Results

Mechanical shock sensitivity

None of the six single tests using an impact energy of 40 J showed any sparking or exploding. Therefore the series

using an impact energy of 7.5 J was not necessary. No impact sensitivity of the test item was observed.

Mechanical friction sensitivity

None of six single tests with a friction force of 360 N showed any visible or audible explosion or crackling, or

sparking. Therefore the series with a friction force of 120 N was not necessary. No friction sensitivity of the test item

was observed.

Thermal sensitivity

The steel tubes were filled with 22.5 g of the substance.

Using the 6 mm orifice after 48 s – 51 s the start of a reaction was observed in the single tests

(orange/greenish coloured flame of about 0.5 m height above the tube). The reaction lasted 29 s – 30 s. No further

observation was made until the burners were turned off after 5 minutes. After cooling down it was observed that all

the tubes were unchanged.

Using the 2 mm orifice after 48 s – 52 s the start of a reaction was observed in the single tests (noisy ejection of

burning test substance with an orange/greenish coloured flame of about 0.7 m height above the tube). The reaction

lasted 30 s – 33 s. No further observation was made until the burners were turned off after 5 minutes. After cooling

down it was observed that all tubes were unchanged.

According to the assessment criteria no thermal sensitivity was detected.

Results

Mechanical shock sensitivity

None of the six single tests using an impact energy of 40 J showed any sparking or exploding. Therefore the series

using an impact energy of 7.5 J was not necessary. No impact sensitivity of the test item was observed.

Mechanical friction sensitivity

None of six single tests with a friction force of 360 N showed any visible or audible explosion or crackling, or

sparking. Therefore the series with a friction force of 120 N was not necessary. No friction sensitivity of the test item

was observed.

Thermal sensitivity

The steel tubes were filled with 22.5 g of the substance.

Using the 6 mm orifice after 48 s – 51 s the start of a reaction was observed in the single tests

(orange/greenish coloured flame of about 0.5 m height above the tube). The reaction lasted 29 s – 30 s. No further

observation was made until the burners were turned off after 5 minutes. After cooling down it was observed that all

the tubes were unchanged.

Using the 2 mm orifice after 48 s – 52 s the start of a reaction was observed in the single tests (noisy ejection of

burning test substance with an orange/greenish coloured flame of about 0.7 m height above the tube). The reaction

lasted 30 s – 33 s. No further observation was made until the burners were turned off after 5 minutes. After cooling

down it was observed that all tubes were unchanged.

According to the assessment criteria no thermal sensitivity was detected.

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
As the sample was neither mechanical sensitive to shock or friction nor thermally sensitive, according to the criteria of EEC test method A.14 it is not representing an explosive hazard and has not to be considered to present a danger of explosion.
Executive summary:

As the Guanidine nitrate sample was neither mechanical sensitive to shock or friction nor thermally sensitive, according to the criteria of EEC test method A.14 it is not representing an explosive hazard and has not to be considered to present a danger of explosion.

Description of key information

Guanidine Nitrate is not explosive.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Explosiveness:
non explosive

Additional information

As Guanidine Nitrate was neither mechanical sensitive to shock or friction nor thermally sensitive, according to the criteria of EEC test method A.14 it is not representing an explosive hazard and has not to be considered to present a danger of explosion.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Non explosive according to tests: neither mechanical sensitive to shock or friction nor thermally sensitive (EEC A.14).