Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
Published: 1986
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Acceptable, well-documented publication which meets basic scientific principles.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Development and Validation of an Alternative Dermal Sensitization Test: The Mouse Ear Swelling Test (MEST)
Author:
S. C. Gad, B. J. Dunn, D. W. Dobbs, C. Reilly, and R. D. Walsh
Year:
1986
Bibliographic source:
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 84, 93-114 (1986)

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Swelling of mouse ear measured after induction and challenge with test substance (MEST).
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
mouse ear swelling test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Perhydroazepine
EC Number:
203-875-9
EC Name:
Perhydroazepine
Cas Number:
111-49-9
Molecular formula:
C6H13N
IUPAC Name:
azepane
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Hexamethylenimine
- purity: >= 98 %

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CF-1
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
other: epicutanous, open (TEST 1) or occlusive (TEST 2)
Vehicle:
other: epicutanous open (TEST 1): acetone ; epicutanous occlusive (TEST 2): propylene glycol
Concentration / amount:
epicutanous open (TEST 1): 1 %
epicutanous occlusive (TEST 2): 1 %
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, open
Vehicle:
other: epicutanous open (TEST 1): acetone ; epicutanous occlusive (TEST 2): propylene glycol
Concentration / amount:
epicutanous open (TEST 1): 1 %
epicutanous occlusive (TEST 2): 1 %
No. of animals per dose:
epicutanous open (TEST 1): 10-15 animals, 6-10 weeks old
epicutanous occlusive (TEST 2): no number indicated, 6-10 weeks old
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS: yes, systemic toxicity is basis for selection of concentration.

MAIN STUDY
(TEST 1)
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE, epicutanous, open
- No. of exposures: 4
- Exposure period: 4 days
- Control group: vehicle only
- Site: abdominal skin
- Frequency of applications: daily
- Duration: no removal of test substance
- Concentrations: 1 %
- Remark: on day 0 prior to substance exposure intradermal injection of Freund's Complete Adjuvant

(TEST 2)
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE, epicutanous, occlusive
- No. of exposures: 3
- Exposure period: 6 days
- Control group: vehicle only
- Site: abdominal skin
- Frequency of applications: on days 0, 2 and 4
- Duration: each patch stayed on the skin for 24 h
- Concentrations: 1 %
- Remark: on day 0 prior to substance exposure intradermal injection of Freund's Complete Adjuvant

(TEST 1 and 2)
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 1, challenge at 10 days (epicutanous, open, i.e. TEST 1) or 11 days (epicutanous, occlusive, i.e. TEST 2) after induction.
- Site: ear
- Concentrations: 5 %
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 h after exposure

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
other: TEST 1, i.e. epicutanous, open: not clarified if the results are from the 24 or 48 h reading
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
1 %
Clinical observations:
40 % responese, 106 % swelling
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: other: TEST 1, i.e. epicutanous, open: not clarified if the results are from the 24 or 48 h reading. Group: test group. Dose level: 1 %. Clinical observations: 40 % responese, 106 % swelling.
Reading:
other: TEST 2, i.e. epicutanous occlusive: not clarified if the results are from the 24 or 48 h reading
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
1 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Clinical observations:
0 % response, 101 % swelling
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: other: TEST 2, i.e. epicutanous occlusive: not clarified if the results are from the 24 or 48 h reading. Group: test group. Dose level: 1 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Clinical observations: 0 % response, 101 % swelling.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Under open epicutanous conditions the test item has sensitizing effects in a MEST. Using the a non standard protocol (repeated patch protocol, epicutaneous occlusive) none of the animals showed a positive test result. Therefore the results are considered ambiguous.
Executive summary:

Sensitising properties of the test substance were investigated using a mouse ear swelling test (MEST). Therefore 10 -15 female CF-1 mice were treated under either epicutanous, open (standard) or occlusive (patch test) conditions. The test substance was applied as a 1% solution.

Using the standard protocol (epicutaneous open) the test substance showed sensitizing effects (40% sensitised; positive when left ear was at least 20% thicker than the right ear). Using the repeated patch protocol none of the animals showed a positive test result.