Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 269-979-1 | CAS number: 68399-68-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The test substance in this study is the penta-phosphonate form and is one of the components in the substance to be registered. It is not considered justifiable to perform further toxicity testing on in view of the absence of adverse effects at nearly 1000 mg/kg/day over 90 days for the penta-phosphonic salt. [ref 7.5.1]
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD 408 - 90 day oral
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- 90 day dietary study, dosed at up to ca. 1000 mg/kg/day equivalent
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- other: Based on sub-chronic data
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- cat
- Strain:
- other: Alpk APfSD (Wistar derived)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Zeneca Pharmaceuticals
- Age at study initiation: 28 days
- Weight at study initiation: 159g (males); 133g (females)
- Fasting period before study: No
- Housing: Four per cage in multiple rat racks.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: One week - Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- other: In feed
- Details on oral exposure:
- DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): The experimental diets were made in 30 kg batches from premixes prepared bymixing the appropriate amount of Dequest 2066A with up to 7 lots of 1 kg batches of milled diet. The premixes were then added to the appropriate amount of diet and mixed thoroughly.
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): Milled CTL diet (no further information)
- Storage temperature of food: - Doses:
0, 100, 1000, 10000ppm
Basis
nominal in diet
8.2, 82.5 and 841.9mg/kg (males) and 9.2, 92.3 and 902.6mg/kg (females) (expressed as salt)
Basis
other: Calculated intakes from food consumption data- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 12
- Control animals:
- yes
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- discriminating dose
- Effect level:
- > 1 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Mortality:
- No mortality up to limit of dosing
- Clinical signs:
- other: No effects
- Gross pathology:
- No effects
- Other findings:
- HAEMATOLOGY: There was an increase in red blood cell levels in males and females at 10000 ppm. Mean cell volume and mean cell haemoglobin were also decreased at this dose. Haemoglobin and mean cell haemaglobin concentration were significantly decreased in females at top dose. Total iron binding capacity in the serum of males only were increased and the total serum iron decreased in females only. All changes described were statistically significant. Perls' staining for iron complexes showed decreases in the spleens of both sexes. Thus, the findings noted in these haematological parameters and serum iron and binding capacity are likely to result from a perturbation of iron homeostasis, which is supported by the reduction of staining in the spleen.The effects are therefore due to the iron binding characteristics of Dequest 2066A, which is a chelating agent. All of these observations are considered to be without toxicological significance.
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- It is not considered justifiable to perform further toxicity testing on in view of the absence of adverse effects at nearly 1000 mg/kg/day over 90 days.
- Executive summary:
From assessment of similar alkyl amine phosphonates, including the analogue substance based on penta-phosphonate, this class of substance is noted as being acutely toxic other than for those where local corrosive effects may be the primary concern. From various data sources, it is considered unlikely that the substance will be acutely toxic with discriminating dose levels in excess of 2000 mg/kg.
There is evidence that these substances are absorbed by ingestion with changes in blood chemistry caused by chelating / sequestering effects’ the 90 day feeding study on the penta-phosphonate noted adaptive changes in blood chemistry and bone density.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- discriminating dose
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- No adverse effects at limit of dosing
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: There is no evidence of dermal toxicity in this group of substances, other than some local irritation effects It is not considered justifiable to perform dermal toxicity testing in view of the similarity with other dyes assessed.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Literature checks were made on the class of substance and there is a lot of data on alkyl amines and their salts.
Derivatives of these have been REACH registered and dossiers disseminated. - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- other: Assessment of data
- Species:
- rat
- Type of coverage:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on dermal exposure:
- Applied in water
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- discriminating dose
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mL/kg bw
- Based on:
- act. ingr.
- Mortality:
- No indication of dose related mortality seen in any study reviewed.
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Other than reports of local irritation effects, no signs of toxicity
No indication of systemic effects. - Executive summary:
From assessment of similar substances, none are noted as being acutely toxic, other than local irritation and corrosion with some amines. There is no evidence of dermal absorption, including assessment of sensitising tests. From various data sources, it is considered unlikely that the substance will be acutely toxic by the dermal route and the discriminating dose will be greater than 2000 mg/kg and the similar substances reviewed fall into this category.
Studies on guinea pigs and rabbits for sensitising and irritancy assessment have not revealed any evidence of adverse systemic effects. Only the maximised sensitising studies (ie injected) appear to give positive results with some azo dyes, confirming low levels of dermal absorption.
It is not considered justifiable to perform dermal toxicity testing in view of the similarity with other dyes assessed. It should also be noted that some other registrations have indicated waivers for this endpoint.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)