Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-157-5 | CAS number: 7440-47-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Ecotoxicological Summary
Administrative data
Hazard for aquatic organisms
Freshwater
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC aqua (freshwater)
- PNEC value:
- 6.5 µg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 2
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Marine water
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no data: aquatic toxicity unlikely
STP
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no data: aquatic toxicity unlikely
Sediment (freshwater)
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC sediment (freshwater)
- PNEC value:
- 205.7 mg/kg sediment dw
- Assessment factor:
- 1
- Extrapolation method:
- sensitivity distribution
Sediment (marine water)
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- insufficient hazard data available (further information necessary)
Hazard for air
Air
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Hazard for terrestrial organisms
Soil
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC soil
- PNEC value:
- 21.1 mg/kg soil dw
- Assessment factor:
- 1
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Hazard for predators
Secondary poisoning
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no potential for bioaccumulation
Additional information
- The T/D test of Chromium metal powder at a loading of 1 mg/L at pH 6 and pH 8 resulted in total Chromium and Cr6+ concentrations below the respective reporting limits (Cr: 0.5 µg/L, Cr6+: 0.05 µg/L) for all measured timepoints (24h, 7d, 28d). Therefore, the extent to which Chromium metal powder can produce soluble available ionic and other metal-bearing species in aqueous media, is limited. (Browers et al., 2018)
- T/D of chromium metal powder (BET specific surface area 0.0035 m2/g) in a screening test resulted at the loading of 100 mg/L in dissolved chromium concentrations that were below the Limit of Detection of 1 µg/L at pH 6 and pH 8 after 24 h (Ullmann, 2009).
- T/D of chromium metal powder (PS < 25 µm, BET specific surface area 0.46 m2/g) resulted at the loading of 100 mg/L in mean dissolved chromium concentrations that were below the Limit of Detection of 1 microg/L at pH 6 and 8 after 24 h, and also at pH 6 after 7-Days.
- T/D of chromium metal powder (BET specific surface area 0.0035 m2/g) resulted at the loading of 100 mg/L in dissolved chromium concentrations that were below the Limit of Detection of 0.01 µg/L at pH 6 after 96 h and below the Limit of Detection of 1 microg/L at pH 8 after 7-Days. Hexavalent chromium concentrations were below the Limit of Detection of 0.01 microg/L in all media. Thus, chromium metal powder is sparingly soluble in environmental media at pH 6 and 8. (Helberg & Wallinder, 2012)
- Part 1 is about Euras Chromium 3+ releases
- Part 2 is about Euras Cr 3+ PEC calculation
- Part 3 focuses on Euras Cr 3+ risk characterization and includes the PNEC calculation.
WHO reported in “Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 76 INORGANIC CHROMIUM(III) COMPOUNDS” (2009) that “Chromium (III) is required by only some microorganisms for specific metabolic processes, such as glucose metabolism and enzyme stimulation (Hughes & Poole, 1989). Huffman & Allaway (1973) demonstrated that chromium was not an essential component of plant nutrition.
Chromium (III), in trace amounts, has been reported to be an essential component of animal nutrition and is
most notably associated with glucose and fat metabolism (Mertz, 1969).”
According to ECHA’s Guidance on the Application of the CLP Criteria (p 580): “The hazard classification schemes for metals and metal compounds are limited to the acute and long-term hazards posed by metals and metal compounds when they are available (i.e. exist as dissolved metal ions, for example, as M+ when present as M-NO3), and do not take into account exposures to metals and metal compounds that are not dissolved in the water column but may still be bioavailable, such as metals in food…”.
Based on the same guidance the approach to define the ecotoxicity of metals and inorganic metal compounds should consider the enclosed testing strategy:
“The level of the metal ion which may be present in solution following the addition of the metal and/or its compounds, will largely be determined by two processes: the extent to which it can be dissolved, i.e. its water solubility, and the extent to which it can react with the media to transform to water soluble forms. The rate and extent at which this latter process, known as ‘transformation’ for the purposes of this guidance, takes place can vary extensively between different compounds and the metal itself, and is an important factor in determining the appropriate hazard class.”
In order to identify and assess the hazard of metals in aquatic environment and in addition to the solubility, pH and medium in which the data has been provided should be considered. To complete the approach and the assessment, the same guidance finally statutes on the T/D to conduct to demonstrate the ecotoxicity potency or non-potency of a metal compound:
“The Full Transformation Dissolution test should be carried out at the pH that maximizes the concentration of dissolved metal ions in solution and that expresses the highest toxicity.
Based on the data from the Full Test, it is possible to generate a concentration of the metal ions in solution after 7-Daysshort-term test) for each of the three loadings (i.e. 1 mg/l as ‘low’, 10 mg/l as ‘medium’ and 100 mg/l as ‘high loading’) used in the test. If the purpose of the test is to assess the long-term hazard of the substance, then the loadings should be 0.01 mg/l, 0.1 mg/l or 1 mg/l depending on the transformation rate and the duration of the test being extended to 28-Days (long-term test).”
Based on this guidance, T/D have been performed (according to guidance OECD 29) and including:
All these results demonstrate the highly insolubility of chromium at different pH and for short (1 day) to long exposure (28-Days), based on the dissolved concentration which as measured below the limit of detection.
The insolubility of metallic chromium and the ubiquitous presence in the environment makes its ecotoxicity very unlikely and also the testing of the environmental degradation and ecotoxicity mainly scientifically unjustified. Due to its highly insolubility, metallic chromium is not classifiable. The toxicity parameters and PNEC values of soluble Cr(3 +) are orders of magnitude higher than concentrations obtained in the solubility tests of metallic chromium. They are presented in the documentation only for comparison.
For information and for comparison, the PNECs for trivalent chromium have been determined in the ICDA (2010) environmental report. The report includes detailed description of the rationale behind the derivation PNECs.
Acute Aquatic Toxicity:
Acute toxicity: For information and for comparison, the PNECs for trivalent chromium have been determined in the ICDA (2010) environmental. WHO (2009) also assessed EC50 on several aquatic species as follows: “96-h median effective concentrations (EC50s) for one freshwater alga, based on growth, ranged from 0.3 to 0.4 mg chromium (III)/l. A 96-h EC50, based on growth, was reported for a marine diatom at 2 mg chromium (III)/l.
96-h LC50s for freshwater fish range from 3.3 mg/l for the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) to 151 mg/l for the bighead (Aristichthys nobilis), whereas 96-h LC50s of 31.5 and 53 mg/l were reported for marine fish.”
Finally, ICDA (2010) stated on PNEC : ”The PNEC has been calculated as 6.5 µg/L for fresh water, PNEC for marine water is unlikely and should be considered as a worst case of the same order of magnitude as for freshwater.” Based on the Figure IV.4 of the CLP guidance version 5:
- Chromium III is not readily soluble
- Several data on different aquatic species are available and demonstrate in comparison to the T/D test that chromium III dissolution value is always highly below the Limit of detection and also below the Ecotoxicity Reference Values as 0.05 µg/L.
In application to this guidance, Chromium metal do not request to be classified for acute aquatic hazard.
Aquatic Long-Term Toxicity:
Regarding the long-term aquatic toxicity, chromium (III) can be also assessed by comparing the dissolved chromium (III) ion level obtained by the T/D tested on several chromium III forms (powders, alloys, etc…) and at a loading rate of 1 mg/L after 28-Days with the lowest chronic ERV as determined for the (soluble) chromium (III) ion.
The ERV is based on the lowest long-term NOEC/EC10 value for aquatic species.
WHO (2009) in “Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 76 INORGANIC CHROMIUM(III) COMPOUNDS” summarized the available toxicity data for chromium (III) have been mainly derived using the water-soluble forms (chromium (III) chloride, chromium (III) nitrate, and chromium potassium sulfate). It has been also concluded in this report that: “In the environment, chromium (III) is likely to be present in much less soluble forms and hence less bioavailable to aquatic organisms.”.
The long-term toxicity for Chromium III water-soluble forms for invertebrates as LC50 are exposed as follows:
“Median lethal concentrations (LC50s) in freshwater invertebrates ranged from 0.1 mg/l (Daphnia pulex) to 442 mg/l (Asellus aquaticus), with a 21-day non-observed-effect concentration (NOEC) (reproduction) of 0.7 mg/l and a life cycle NOEC of 0.047 mg/l for Daphnia magna.”
Several publications also quoted in the same report allow to confirm the absence of long-term effects on fishes:
“Walsh et al. (1994) studied the effect of chromium (III) effluent from a tannery on marine grey mullet (Chelon labrosus). Fish exposed for 2 months to contaminated sediment (46 mg chromium/kg dw) and food (Enteromorpha intestinalis [9.4 mg/kg] and Mytilus edulis [6 mg/kg]) showed no adverse effects on growth, mortality, or gross tissue damage. Significant bioaccumulation was measured in livers of exposed fish; however,
chromium levels in liver samples from fish at the contaminated site were not significantly higher than those of controls.”
ICDA conducted and published in 2010 a voluntary environmental risk assessment report about Metallic Chromium and Trivalent Chromium Compounds in 3 parts:
Based on 7-Days on different species and studies, treated the data by total risk approach and added risk approach, considered the uncertainties, the PNEC aquatic long-term was concluded to be 6.5 µg/L.
The report concluded on this part:
“In order to be able to conduct the risk characterisation for trivalent chromium in the aquatic environment, a pragmatic approach was followed: the PNEC aquatic for trivalent chromium was estimated by using an provisional assessment factor of 2 on the HC5,50% resulting in an added and total PNEC aquatic of 6.5 μg Cr/L. The latter value results from a dataset that is characterised by a large degree of uncertainty end which clearly do not fulfill all data requirements as stated in the TGD (2003) or by the London workshop (2001).”
Hence, the substance chromium (III) is not sufficiently dissolved / bioavailable to cause chronic toxicity at the level of the chronic ERV which are far above the solubility measured during the T/D test as the Limit of Detection.
Conclusion on classification
The insolubility of metallic chromium and the ubiquitous presence in the environment makes its ecotoxicity very unlikely and also the testing of the environmental degradation and ecotoxicity mainly scientifically unjustified. The lack of endpoint data from metallic chromium do not allow the derivation of PNECs.
Due to insolubity, metallic chromium is not classfiable. The toxicity parameters and PNEC values of soluble Cr(3 +) are orders of magnitude higher than concentrations obtained in the solubility tests of metallic chromium. They are presented in the documentation only for comparison.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.