Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

- Ames Test (OECD 471, K, rel. 2): non mutagenic up to cytotoxic concentrations in S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98, TA 100 & E.coli WP2.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1976
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
purity of test substance, no. of cells per culture, no. of replications, vehicle, signs of toxicity, evaluation and interpretation of results, individual plate counts not reported
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
purity of test substance, no. of cells per culture, no. of replications, vehicle, signs of toxicity, evaluation and interpretation of results, individual plate counts not reported
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Not applicable
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
pre-GLP
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
Histidine and tryptophan for S. typhimurium and E. Coli, respectively.
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
not applicable
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
not applicable
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254-stimulated, rat liver-homogenate metabolic activation system was used
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 2500 and 5000 μg/plate, with and without S9-mix in S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 & TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
other: 6-propiolactone (50 μg/plate for TA 1535); 2-Anthramine (20 μg/plate for TA 98, TA 100 and WP2)
Remarks:
without metabolic activation
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-Anthramine
Remarks:
with metabolic activation
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
SOURCE OF TEST SYSTEM: S. typhimurium strains were obtained from Dr. Bruce Ames of the University of California at Berkeley. E. coli WP2 was obtained from Dr. D. McCalla.

METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Exposure duration: Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 2 days.
Evaluation criteria:
None
Statistics:
None
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid

Table 7.6.1/1: Ames test - results

Test substance

Dose levels (µg/plate)

Mean no. Of revertants per plate

Histidine revertants

Tryptophan revertants

TA 1535

TA 1537

TA 1538

TA 98

TA 100

E. coli WP2

Without metabolic activation

Negative control

-

23

10

14

29

160

76

TATB

5

41

13

15

28

151

-

10

30

7

12

32

126

81

50

32

7

13

25

148

93

100

35

8

16

21

148

78

500

40

8

9

25

146

95

1000

25

10

14

25

125

69

2500

31

8

9

28

152

84

5000

33

8

14

30

125

87

Positive control

*

680

>2000

310

40

160

72

With metabolic activation

Negative control

-

17

11

24

57

156

81

TATB

5

23

7

19

34

128

-

10

20

9

28

25

151

91

50

24

10

22

42

138

108

100

22

7

20

39

132

87

500

20

13

21

34

145

88

1000

18

6

17

35

139

88

2500

20

8

16

27

143

88

5000

20

6

15

33

173

94

Positive control

**

-

-

-

>2000

>2000

1170

*Without metabolic activation - 9-Aminoacridine (100 μg/plate for TA 1537); 2-Nitrofluorene (50 μg/plate for TA 1538); 6-propiolactone (50 μg/plate for TA 1535); 2-Anthramine (20 μg/plate for TA 98, TA 100 and WP2)

**With metabolic activation - 2-Anthramine (20 μg/plate for TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2)

Conclusions:
Under the test conditions, test substance is not considered as mutagenic in S. typhimurium (TA1535, TA1537, TA 1538, TA98 and TA100) and E. coli WP2 strains.
Executive summary:

In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria, performed similarly to the OECD Guideline 471, strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA1535, TA1537, TA 1538, TA98 and TA100) and Escherichia coli WP2 were exposed to test substance at the following concentrations using the plate incorporation method: 

5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 2500 and 5000 μg/plate, with and without S9-mix

 

Negative and positive control groups were also included in mutagenicity tests.

 

The mean numbers of revertant colonies are fell within acceptable ranges for negative control treatments, and were elevated by positive control treatments.

 

No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, at any dose level either with or without metabolic activation. 

 

Under the test conditions, test substance is not considered as mutagenic in S. typhimurium (TA1535, TA1537, TA 1538, TA98 and TA100) and E. coli WP2 strains.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Table 7.6/1: Summary of genotoxicity tests

Test n°

Test / Guideline

Reliability

Focus

Strains tested

Metabolic activation

Test concentration

Statement

1

 

Newell,

1976

Ames Test

(OECD 471)

K, rel. 2

Gene mutation

TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98,

TA 100,

E. coli WP2

-S9

+S9

Up to

5000 µg/plate

-S9 : non mutagenic

+S9 : non mutagenic

 

Gene mutation Assay (Test n° 1):

A Bacterial Reverse mutation Assay (Ames test) was performed similarly to OECD guideline No. 471. Strains of S. typhimurium and E. Coli were exposed to the test substance at the following concentrations using the plate incorporation method: 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains under the test condition, with any dose of the substance, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation.The mean numbers of revertant colonies are fell within acceptable ranges for negative control treatments, and were elevated by positive control treatments.The substance is therefore considered as non-mutagenic according to the Ames test.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Harmonized classification:

The test material has no harmonized classification for human health according to the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.

Self-classification:

Based on the available data, no additional classification is proposed regarding germ cell mutagenicity according to the Annex VI of the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and according to the GHS.