Registration Dossier

Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Explosiveness

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
explosive properties of explosives
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1985
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study without detailed documentation
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
UN Manual of Tests and Criteria: Part I: Classification procedures, test methods and criteria relating to explosives of Class 1
GLP compliance:
no
Key result
Test series:
UN Test series 3
Method:
other: UN Test 3 (a) (iv): 30 kg Fallhammer test
Parameter:
other: drop height (no propagation)
Value:
4
Result:
negative, no propagation of detonation
Remarks:
>= 4 m
Test series:
UN Test series 3
Method:
other: UN Test 3 (a) (iv): 30 kg Fallhammer test
Parameter:
other: drop height (no reaction)
Value:
2.25
Result:
other: no reaction
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Executive summary:

The substance was tested for sensitiveness to drop-weight impact, according to UN 30 kg fallhammer test.

The drop-weight height without propagation was >= 4 m, therefore the result is considered negative.

Endpoint:
explosive properties of explosives
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1985
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: NFT 70-503
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
UN Manual of Tests and Criteria: Part I: Classification procedures, test methods and criteria relating to explosives of Class 1
GLP compliance:
no
Test series:
UN Test series 3
Method:
UN Test 3 (b) (i): BAM friction apparatus
Parameter:
limiting load (N)
Value:
353
Result:
other: inconclusive, > 353 N
Remarks:
Julius Peters friction apparatus
Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Executive summary:

The substance was tested for sensitiveness to friction, according to NFT 70-503, similar to BAM apparatus.

The maximum load tested was 353 N, i.e. below the UN threshold of 360 N, therefore the negative result is not sufficient for purpose of classification procedure according to CLP.

Endpoint:
explosive properties of explosives
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1989
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: NFT 70-502
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Priming the detonation is performed through screen cards. The number of cards given is the minimum number required to prevent priming.
GLP compliance:
no
Test series:
test data derived by a competent authority
Method:
other: NFT 70-502
Parameter:
other: minimum number of screen cards to prevent priming.
Value:
190
Result:
other: minimum number of screen cards to prevent priming.
Executive summary:

The substance was tested for priming the detonation through a barrier, according to NFT 70-502.

A minimum number of 190 cards was found to prevent priming.

Endpoint:
explosive properties of explosives
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1980
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: NFT 70-507
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Deflagration in open air in trough.
GLP compliance:
no
Test series:
test data derived by a competent authority
Method:
other: NFT 70-507
Parameter:
other: propagation rate
Value:
0
Result:
negative, no or slow deflagration

In the two assays conducted (loading length 20 cm), the substance did not burn or melt, during the 10 min period of ignition.

Executive summary:

The substance was tested for deflagration in open air in trough, according to NFT 70-507.

No burning or melting was observed upon heating.

Description of key information

The substance is classified as an explosive, with mass explosion hazard.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Explosiveness:
explosive

Additional information

Experimental data is available with regard to impact sensitivity, friction, priming the detonation, and deflagration, and is considered sufficient for classification purpose.

Supporting literature provides additional information on thermal properties and performances of the explosive.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Classification was performed according to testing protocol and decision tree described in French Arrêté and Circulaire of 20/04/2007, relating to risk assessment and prevention of accidents in pyrotechnique plants.

Considering the substance was assigned to the worst-case division 1.1, no new testing was deemed necessary.