Perfluoralkylchemikalien (PFAS)

Per- und Polyfluoralkylsubstanzen (PFAS) sind eine große Familie von tausenden synthetischen Chemikalien, die in der Gesellschaft weit verbreitet sind und in der Umwelt vorkommen. 

Sie alle enthalten Kohlenstoff-Fluor-Bindungen, die zu den stärksten chemischen Bindungen in der organischen Chemie gehören. Das bedeutet, dass sie schwer abbaubar sind, sowohl bei ihrer Verwendung als auch in der Umwelt. Die meisten PFAS werden zudem einfach in der Umwelt transportiert, wobei große Strecken von der Quelle ihrer Freisetzung zurückgelegt werden. 

Es wird häufig festgestellt, dass PFAS das Grundwasser, Oberflächengewässer und Böden verunreinigen. Die Reinigung kontaminierter Orte ist technisch schwierig und kostspielig. Wenn die Freisetzung anhält, werden sich PFAS weiter in der Umwelt, im Trinkwasser und in der Nahrung anreichern.

Updates PFAS

What are PFASs and what are they used for?

PFAS have a wide range of different physical and chemical properties. They can be gases, liquids, or solid high-molecular weight polymers. Some PFAS are described as long-chain or short-chain, but this does not cover all of the different kinds of structures that are present in the PFAS class, which is very diverse. PFASs can be sorted in many ways based on their structure.

PFAS are widely used as they have unique desirable properties. For instance, they are stable under intense heat. Many of them are also surfactants and are used, for example, as water and grease repellents.

Some of the major industry sectors using PFAS include aerospace and defence, automotive, aviation, food contact materials, textiles, leather and apparel, construction and household products, electronics, firefighting, food processing, and medical articles.

Over the past decades, global manufacturers have started to replace certain PFAS with other PFAS or with fluorine-free substances. This trend has been driven by the fact that scientists and governments around the world first recognised the harmful effects of some PFAS (particularly long-chain PFAS) on human health and the environment. As the focus shifted to other PFAS, these have also been found to have properties of concern.

What are the concerns?

The majority of PFAS are persistent in the environment. Some PFAS are known to persist in the environment longer than any other synthetic substance. As a consequence of this persistence, as long as PFAS continue to be released to the environment, humans and other species will be exposed to ever greater concentrations. Even if all releases of PFAS would cease tomorrow, they would continue to be present in the environment, and humans, for generations to come.

The behaviour of PFAS in the environment means that they tend to pollute groundwater and drinking water, which is difficult and costly to remediate. Certain PFAS are known to accumulate in people, animals and plants and cause toxic effects. Certain PFASs are toxic for reproduction and can harm the development of foetuses. Several PFAS may cause cancer in humans. Some PFAS are also suspected of interfering with the human endocrine (hormonal) system.

PFAS are released into the environment from direct and indirect sources, for example, from professional and industrial facilities using PFAS, during use of consumer products (e.g. cosmetics, ski waxes, clothing) and from food contact materials. Humans can be exposed to them every day at home, in their workplace and through the environment, for example, from the food they eat and drinking water.
 

How are PFASs regulated in the EU?
 
Globally regulated PFAS 
 
Since 2009, perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and its derivatives (PFOS) have been included in the international Stockholm Convention to eliminate their use. PFOS has been restricted in the EU for more than 10 years already, under the EU’s Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Regulation.
 
The Stockholm Convention also regulates the global elimination of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), its salts and PFOA-related compounds. PFOA has been banned under the POPs Regulation since 4 July 2020.
 

In June 2022, the Stockholm Convention parties decided to include PFHxS, its salts and related compounds in the treaty. This global ban is expected to enter into force at the end of 2023.

Long-chain perfluorinated carboxylic acids (C9-21 PFCAs) are being considered for inclusion in the Stockholm Convention and consequent global elimination. 

 
REACH restrictions
 
Perfluorinated carboxylic acids (C9-14 PFCAs), their salts and precursors will be restricted in the EU/EEA from February 2023 onwards following a decision taken by the European Commission on a proposal by the German and Swedish authorities. 
 
Norway has proposed a restriction on perfluorohexane-1-sulphonic acid (PFHxS), its salts and related substances. ECHA's scientific committees for Risk Assessment (RAC) and for Socio-Economic Analysis (SEAC) gave their opinion supporting the restriction in June 2020.
 
Germany has proposed a further restriction for undecafluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), its salts and related substances. This proposal was evaluated by ECHA's scientific committees in December 2021. The European Commission together with the EU countries will decide on the restriction in due course.
 

The national authorities of Germany, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden are proposing a restriction covering a wide range of PFAS uses – in support of the statements made in the Environment Council in December 2019. They submitted their proposal to ECHA in January 2023, and ECHA’s scientific committees are now evaluating it.

Furthermore, ECHA introduced in January 2022 a restriction proposal for PFAS used in firefighting foams. ECHA's scientific committees are expected to finalise the evaluation of the proposal in June 2023. This use is not included in the wider PFAS restriction proposed by the five national authorities.

Substances of very high concern under REACH
 
A number of PFAS are on the REACH Candidate List of substances of very high concern (SVHC), for example PFOA, perfluorinated carboxylic acids (C9-14 PFCAs) and PFHxS.
 
In June 2019, January 2020 and January 2023, three groups of PFAS were identified as SVHCs. 
 
These groups are:
 
  • 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)propionic acid, its salts and its acyl halides (HFPO-DA), a short-chain PFAS substitute for PFOA in fluoropolymer production, was the first substance added to the Candidate List. Its ammonium salt is commonly known as GenX. [General Court judgment]; 
  • perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS) and its salts, a replacement of PFOS; and 
  • perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA) and its salts.
The SVHC identification was based on their persistence, mobility and toxicity, which were considered to pose a threat to human health and wildlife when exposed through the environment (including through drinking water). These PFAS were identified as of equivalent concern to carcinogens, mutagens and reprotoxicants (CMRs) and persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic/very persistent and very bioaccumulative (PBTs/vPvBs) chemicals.

 
Evaluation of substances under REACH
 
Several additional PFAS are on the list for evaluation (Community rolling action plan) over the coming years or have already been evaluated. The evaluation aims to clarify initial concerns on the potential risk to human health or the environment that manufacturing or using these substances could pose.

 
Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation
 
A few PFAS already have a harmonised classification and labelling under the CLP Regulation. These include:
 
  • perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA);
  • ammonium pentadecafluorooctanoate (APFO);
  • perfluorononan-1-oic acid (PFNA) and its sodium and ammonium salts;
  • nonadecafluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) and its sodium and ammonium salts; and
  • perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA).
 
RAC has also issued an opinion on the harmonised classification and labelling for  3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,7,8,8,8-tridecafluorooctan-1-ol (6:2 FTOH). This opinion is currently in the European Commission for decision-making together with the EU countries for inclusion into the CLP Regulation.
 
Assessing groups of PFAS
 
An informal coordination group of several EU countries, ECHA and the European Commission has, since 2014, screened data on PFAS contained in ECHA’s registration database and coordinated group-based regulatory work.
 
Despite an efficient approach compared to regulating substance by substance, work has only been able to cover the PFAS groups of highest urgency due to the very large number of PFAS. 
 
ECHA’s database contains information of several thousand individual PFAS on the EU market. These belong to a variety of subgroups. Assessing and, where relevant, managing risks subgroup by subgroup would require a considerable amount of time. Therefore, ECHA acknowledges that a holistic group approach to regulatory assessment and risk management needs to be explored.
 
The EU’s chemicals strategy for sustainability places PFAS policy front and centre. The European Commission commits to phasing out all PFAS, allowing their use only where they are proven to be irreplaceable and essential to society.  
 
Drinking water 
 
The recast of the Drinking Water Directive, which took effect on 12 January 2021, includes a limit of 0.5 µg/l for all PFAS. This is in line with a grouping approach for all PFASs. 
 
PFAS and food
 
PFAS are released into the environment through industrial manufacturing not directly linked to food production and through the use and disposal of PFAS-containing products.  However, as often with persistent pollutants, they end up in food. The main contributors to human dietary exposure are certain vegetables but drinking water is also an important source. Some PFAS also accumulate in human bodies through fish and seafood, meat and meat products, eggs, milk and dairy products. 
 
In September 2020, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) set a new safety threshold for the main perfluoroalkyl substances that accumulate in the body: perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS). The threshold – a group tolerable weekly intake (TWI) of 4.4 nanograms per kilogram of body weight per week – is part of a scientific opinion on the risks to people’s health from the presence of these substances in food. EFSA’s scientific advice will support risk managers in their decisions on how best to protect consumers from exposure to PFAS through food.

 

Video on the European ban on PFAS prepared by the The Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Copyright: RIVM.

 
Related
 

Restriction of PFASs in firefighting foams:

Broad PFAS restriction:

Other: