Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Oral: LD50 = 3200 mg/kg body weight leading to no classification according to CLP

Dermal: LD50 > 5000 mg/kg body weight leading to no classification according to CLP

Inhalation: no information available

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Quality of whole database:
Only one key study is available. This GLP study is similar to OECD TG 401.

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Quality of whole database:
Only one study is available in whole database for the acute dermal toxicity. This GLP study is similar to OECD TG 402.

Additional information

- oral toxicity: The substance 4-phenylbutan-2-one is not acutely toxic to rats in a reliable and valid acute oral toxicity study and the oral LD50 value is 3200 mg/kg body weight (Moreno 1980). The supporting study (Tongbao 1980) reports an oral LD50 value of 1590 mg/kg body weight in mice, however, this result is considered as not reliable. Since this study has Klimisch 3 scoring, it is given a lower weight of evidence than the rat study.

- dermal toxicity: The substance 4-phenylbutan-2-one is not acutely toxic in a reliable and valid acute dermal toxicity study in rabbits with a dermal LD50 value > 5000 mg/kg body weight (Moreno 1980).

- inhalation toxicity: Information about the acute inhalation toxicity of the substance is not available.

Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint

A reliable with restrictions key study similar to OECD TG 401.

Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint

A reliable with restrictions key study similar to OECD TG 402.

Justification for classification or non-classification

- oral toxicity:

Based on the above stated assessment of the acute oral toxicity of 4-phenylbutan-2-one, the results from reliable study are above the threshold value given in the CLP Regulation. Therefore 4-phenylbutan-2-one does not need to be classified according to Council Directive 2001/59/EC (28th ATP of Directive 67/548/EEC) and according to CLP (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council) as implementation of UN-GHS in the EU.

- dermal toxicity:

Based on the above stated assessment of the acute dermal toxicity, 4-phenylbutan-2-one does not need to be classified according to Council Directive 2001/59/EC (28th ATP of Directive 67/548/EEC) and according to CLP (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council) as implementation of UN-GHS in the EU.

- inhalation toxicity:

According to regulation (EC) 1907/2006 Annex XI (weight of evidence), testing for acute inhalation toxicity is not considered to be required, for the following reasons:

- 4-phenylbutan-2-one has a moderate vapour pressure of 5.6 Pa at 25°C, which corresponds to 5.6 Pa / 101325 Pa x 10e6 ppm = 55 ppm saturated vapour pressure corresponding to 333 mg/m³ or 0,33 mg/L (with a molecular weight of 148.2 g/mol). Thus an acute 4-hour inhalation study would either be carried out at 0.33 mg/L vapour or at the limit dose of 5 mg/L aerosol. Assuming a very conservative value of 100% bioavailability, a rat would receive a systemic dose of 0,8 L/min/kg x 240 min x 5 mg/L aerosol = 960 mg/kg.

- Since the acute oral LD50 was higher than this value, it is considered unlikely that mortality would be observed in an acute inhalation study.

- With regard to possible local respiratory effects, 4-phenylbutan-2-one is not classified for skin or eye irritation and showed no effects on skin and eyes. Therefore, 4-phenylbutan-2-one is considered unlikely to exert a relevant local irritative effect on respiratory mucosal membranes.

Therefore, performance of an acute inhalation study is considered not necessary for scientific reasons and 4-phenylbutan-2-one is considered unlikely to exert effects upon inhalation that would require classification according to Council Directive 2001/59/EC (28th ATP of Directive 67/548/EEC) and according to CLP (Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.