Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Water solubility

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
water solubility
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
06 June 2019 to 07 June 2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD Guideline 115: Surface Tension of Aqueous Solutions
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: EU Method A.5 Surface Tension
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Date of Inspection: 21 August 2018 Date of Issue: 19 November 2018
Type of method:
other: critical micelle concentration (CMC)
Remarks:
CMC is being used as a surrogate water solubility value as the test item is surface active
Key result
Water solubility:
5.15 mg/L
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Temp.:
20 °C
pH:
>= 4.7 - <= 6.1

Table 1

 

Concentration (mg/L)

Age of Solution (min)

Reading (mN/m)

Temperature (°C)

 

1.09 x 103

70

31.0

20.0

73

31.0

20.0

76

31.0

20.0

 

327

87

32.0

20.0

91

31.5

20.0

94

31.5

20.0

 

109

105

31.5

20.0

108

32.0

20.0

111

32.0

20.0

 

32.7

123

32.5

20.0

126

32.0

20.0

130

32.5

20.0

 

10.9

141

34.0

20.0

144

33.5

20.0

147

33.5

20.0

 

3.27

158

38.5

20.0

161

38.0

20.0

165

38.0

20.0

 

 

 

 

1.09

203

47.0

20.0

207

47.5

20.0

212

50.5

20.0

216

53.0

20.0

220

54.5

20.0

223

56.0

20.0

245

62.0

20.0

249

62.0

20.0

252

62.0

20.0

 

0.327

264

65.0

20.0

267

64.5

20.0

271

65.0

20.0

 

0.109

370

73.0

20.0

373

72.5

20.0

376

72.5

20.0

Mean surface tension values were based on the last three readings for a particular concentration which were considered to be constant.

The concentration (mg/L), log10 [concentration(mg/L)/ and mean surface tension values for the sample solutions are shown in the following table:

Table 2

Concentration (mg/L)

Log10Concentration

Mean Surface Tension (mN/m)

Solution pH

1.09 x 103

3.04

31.0

4.7

327

2.51

31.7

5.7

109

2.04

31.8

6.1

32.7

1.51

32.3

6.0

10.9

1.04

33.7

5.9

3.27

0.514

38.2

5.6

1.09

0.037

62.0

5.6

0.327

-0.486

64.8

5.5

0.109

-0.963

72.7

5.6

The plot of log10[concentration(mg/L)] versus surface tension (mN/m) is shown in Figure 1, attached as an Illustration.

Line 1 (red) was generated from linear regression of 2 sample solution concentrations for which surface tension was shown to be concentration dependent and Line 2 (green) was generated from the linear regression of 4 sample solution concentrations for which the surface tension was observed to be essentially independent of concentration.

The intersection of these two lines gave the critical micelle concentration and was calculated by solving the two equations:

Line 1 equation: y = -26.6x + 51.873

Line 2 equation: y = -0.796x + 33.511

The sample solution at 10.9 mg/L was not used in generating the two lines. At this concentration the surface tension appeared to be transitioning to Line 2 at a shallower gradient than Line 1.

The sample solution at 0.109 mg/L was not used in generating the two lines. At this concentration the surface tension was only slightly affected and was approaching that of purified water.

It was decided to not use the 1.09 mg/L sample result in creating the concentration dependent line. Using all three results from the 3.27, 1.09 and 0.327 mg/L samples didn’t product a line with a satisfactory looking fit. Additionally, the 1.09 mg/L was the only sample that didn’t give consistent values in three measurements, requiring nine; this is an effect that is frequently seen when the surface tension becomes concentration dependent. Concentrations towards the ends of the concentration dependent line typical generate more consistent measurements. For these reason, the results from the 3.27 and 0.327 mg/L samples were considered more reliable.

The CMC was determined to be 5.15 mg/L.

Conclusions:
The critical micelle concentration of the test item was determined to be 5.15 mg/L at 20.0 ± 0.5°C.
Executive summary:

The critical micelle concentration of the test item has been determined to be 5.15 mg/L at 20.0 ± 0.5 °C, by determining the surface tension of a range of aqueous sample solutions of differing concentration, using a procedure based on Method A.5 Surface Tension of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 and Method 115 of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, 27 July 1995. As the surface tension test confirmed that the substance is a surfactant, traditional water solubility tests are not applicable. For surfactants, critical micelle concentration is considered an effective surrogate value for water solubility

Description of key information

Critical micelle concentration: 5.15 mg/L at 20°C; OECD 115; Fox, J. M. (2019)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Water solubility:
5.15 mg/L
at the temperature of:
20 °C

Additional information