Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 922-551-4 | CAS number: 1187440-66-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Adsorption / desorption
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- adsorption / desorption, other
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- February 20, 2020 - September 24, 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 020
- Report date:
- 2020
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 106 (Adsorption - Desorption Using a Batch Equilibrium Method)
- Version / remarks:
- as revised in 1997
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deviations are not critical and have no impact on the results presented in this report.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of method:
- batch equilibrium method
- Media:
- soil
Test material
- Test material form:
- solid: flakes
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Lot/batch number of test material: 190604011722
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: June 3 rd , 2022
- Purity test date: 2019/06/14 - Radiolabelling:
- no
Study design
- Test temperature:
- All experiments were performed at laboratory ambient temperature (temperature between 20°C and 25°C). The temperature was recorded during the experiments.
Batch equilibrium or other method
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Adsorption Kinetic:
The samples were collected sequentially at 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2 and 4 hours for five soils.
Tier 3 of OECD 106 test was not conduct in that study (Freundlich adsorption isotherm and Desorption kinetic).
Matrix propertiesopen allclose all
- Matrix no.:
- #5
- Matrix type:
- clay
- % Clay:
- 41.2
- % Org. carbon:
- 1.7
- pH:
- 7.3
- CEC:
- 23.2 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Matrix no.:
- #4
- Matrix type:
- loam
- % Clay:
- 25.9
- % Org. carbon:
- 1.95
- pH:
- 7.4
- CEC:
- 21.2 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Matrix no.:
- #3
- Matrix type:
- sandy loam
- % Clay:
- 7.3
- % Org. carbon:
- 0.65
- pH:
- 6.1
- CEC:
- 6.8 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Matrix no.:
- #2
- Matrix type:
- sandy loam
- % Clay:
- 8.9
- % Org. carbon:
- 1.61
- pH:
- 5.6
- CEC:
- 8.5 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Matrix no.:
- #1
- Matrix type:
- loamy sand
- % Clay:
- 4.1
- % Org. carbon:
- 0.63
- pH:
- 4.7
- CEC:
- 3.7 meq/100 g soil d.w.
- Details on matrix:
- The supplier of soils is LUFA SPEYER located in Germany.
Sampling date:
#1 = standard soil type n° 2.1: 2019/10/15
#2 = standard soil type n° 2.2: 2019/10/07
#3 = standard soil type n° 2.3: 2019/10/07
#4 = standard soil type n° 2.4: 2019/10/16
#5 = standard soil type n° 6S: 2019/10/21
Sampling site: Country/ State/ Community
Soil 2.1: Germany/ Rheinland- Pfalz/ Dudenhofen
Soil 2.2: Germany/ Rheinland- Pfalz/ Hanhofen
Soil 2.3: Germany/ Rheinland- Pfalz/ Offenbach
Soil 2.4: Germany/ Rheinland- Pfalz/ Leimersheim
Soil 6S: Germany/ Rheinland- Pfalz/ Siebeldingen
Plants:
-Soils 2.1, 2.3 and 6S: sampling year (2019) uncultivated and former years 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015: uncultivated
- Soil 2.2: sampling year (2019) meadow and former years 22018, 2017, 2016, 2015: meadow
- Soil 2.4: sampling year (2019) meadow with apple trees and former years 22018, 2017, 2016, 2015: meadow with apple trees
Fertilization: all soils:
No organic fertilization and none fertilization in 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015
Pesticides: all soils
sampling years and 4 former years: none
More details in the attached report (Annex 7.1 Study plan appendix 2). - Details on test conditions:
- Tier 1- Preliminary study
The aim of this Tier 1 was to determine the Kd value at equilibrium in order to select the appropriate soil:solution ratio for the Tier -2.
All experiments were performed at laboratory ambient temperature (temperature between 20°C and 25°C). The temperature was recorded during the experiments.
Selection of optimal soil/solution ratios
Two soil types (standard soil type no. 2.1 (Loamy Sand) - 6S (Clay)) and three soil/solution ratios were used.
The soil/solution ratios are as follows:
- 10 g soil and 50 mL aqueous solution of the test item (ratio 1/5),
- 2 g soil and 50 mL aqueous solution of the test item (ratio 1/25)
- 0.5 g soil and 50 mL aqueous solution of the test item (ratio 1/100),
The absolute mass of soil and volume of aqueous solution corresponding to these ratios can be different with respect to laboratory equipments.
STUDY DESIGN:
The soil samples was equilibrated by shaking with a minimum volume of 45 mL of 0.01 M CaCl2 overnight (12h) before the day of experiment. Afterwards, a certain volume of the stock solution of the test item was added in order to adjust the final volume at 50 mL. This volume of the stock solution added should preferably result in an initial concentration of the test item being with the soil (C0: 10 mg/L (initial concentration)) at least two orders of magnitude higher than the detection limit of the analytical method.
The mixture was shaken until adsorption equilibrium was reached. The samples were collected sequentially over a 24 h period of mixing (1, 4, 24 h). Then, the samples were separated by centrifugation, the aqueous phase was analysed according to the validated method.
One control sample with only the test item in 0.01 M CaCl2 solution (no soil) was subjected to precisely the same steps, in order to check the stability of the test item in CaCl2 solution and its possible adsorption on the surfaces of the tests vessels.
A blank run per soil with the same amount of soil and total volume of 50 mL 0.01 M CaCl2 solution (without test item) was subjected to the same procedure. This serves as a background control during the analysis to detect interfering compounds.
The pH of the aqueous phase was measured before and after contact with the soil.
All the experiments, including controls and blanks were performed in duplicate.
The mass balance was performed on both soils and for one soil/solution ratio 1:5 (w:v) after the ratio-finding experiment is completed (measurement of depletion in solution more than 20% at equilibrium). After 24h of equilibrium, the phases were separated by centrifugation and the test item concentration in the aqueous phase was determined. The amount of test item absorbed to the soil was measured after one extraction with a mixture of solvents (Hexan/Aceton (50:50)(v:v).Then, the extracts were quantified according to the validated method by GC/FID. The data was calculated with the calibration curve using for the chemical analysis of test item in aqueous phase.
The quantity of test item in the soil and aqueous phase was determined and the mass balance was calculated. If the mass balance of the test item is less than 90%, the test item is considered to be unstable in the time scale of test which will have to be taken into account for the following tests.
The percentage adsorption was calculated at each time on the basis of the nominal initial concentration and the measured concentration at the sampling time corrected for the value of the blank if relevant. Plots of the percentage adsorption versus time were performed in order to estimate the achievement of equilibrium plateau. The Kd value at equilibrium was also calculated. Based on this Kd value, appropriate soil/solution ratios was selected, so the percentage adsorption reaches above 20 %.
Tier 2- Adsorption kinetics at one concentration
The aim of Tier 2 was to determine the distribution coefficient Kd value at equilibrium, as well as the organic carbon normalized adsorption coefficient Koc and the logarithm based 10 of Koc (logKoc) for the five soils and for C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol.
All experiments were performed at laboratory ambient temperature (temperature between 20°C and 25°C). The temperature was recorded during the experiments.
Five soil types and one soil/solution ratio were used. The supplier of soils is LUFA SPEYER located in Germany.
The soil/solution ratio was as follow:
- 0.5 g soil and 50 mL aqueous solution of the test item (ratio 1/100),
STUDY DESIGN
The soil samples were equilibrated by shaking with a minimum volume of 45 mL of 0.01 M CaCl2 overnight (12h) before the day of experiment. Following pre-equilibration, the samples with and without soil were spiked with the test item at a nominal concentration of 10 mg/L and shaken for 4 hours until adsorption equilibrium was reached. The samples were collected sequentially at 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2 and 4 hours.
Then, the samples were separated by centrifugation and then, the aqueous phase was analysed according to the validated method by GC/FID.
One control sample with only the test item in 0.01 M CaCl2 solution (no soil) was subjected to precisely the same steps, in order to check the stability of the test item in CaCl2 solution and its possible adsorption on the surfaces of the tests vessels.
A blank run per soil with the same amount of soil and total volume of 50 mL 0.01 M CaCl2 solution (without test item) was subjected to the same procedure. This serves as a background control during the analysis to detect interfering compounds.
The pH of the aqueous phase was measured before and after contact with the soil.
All the experiments, including controls and blanks were performed in duplicate.
The percentage adsorption was calculated at each time on the basis of the nominal initial concentration and the measured concentration at the sampling time corrected for the value of the blank if relevant. Plots of the percentage adsorption versus time were performed in order to estimate the achievement of equilibrium plateau. The distribution coefficient Kd value at equilibrium, as well as the organic carbon normalized adsorption coefficient Koc (for non-polar organic chemicals) were also calculated.
Duration of adsorption equilibrationopen allclose all
- Sample No.:
- #5
- Duration:
- 4 h
- Initial conc. measured:
- >= 3.15 - <= 3.69 other: µg/cm3
- pH:
- 7.29
- Remarks:
- mean concentrations (ti) (aqueous phase) C20 Alcohol (3.69) and C22 Alcohol (3.15)
- Sample No.:
- #4
- Duration:
- 4 h
- Initial conc. measured:
- >= 2.55 - <= 2.79 other: µg/cm3
- pH:
- 7.43
- Remarks:
- mean concentrations (ti) (aqueous phase) C20 Alcohol (2.79) and C22 Alcohol
- Sample No.:
- #3
- Duration:
- 4 h
- Initial conc. measured:
- >= 2.84 - <= 2.89 other: µg/cm3
- pH:
- 7.16
- Remarks:
- mean (ti) concentrations (aqueous phase) C20 Alcohol (2.84) and C22 Alcohol (2.89)
- Sample No.:
- #1
- Duration:
- 4 h
- Initial conc. measured:
- >= 2.41 - <= 2.81 other: µg/cm3
- pH:
- 7.16
- Remarks:
- mean (ti) concentrations (aqueous phase) C20 Alcohol (2.81) C22 Alcohol (2.41)
- Sample No.:
- #2
- Duration:
- 4 h
- Initial conc. measured:
- >= 3.05 - <= 3.6 other: µg/cm3
- pH:
- 7.11
- Remarks:
- mean (ti) concentrations (aqueous phase) C20 Alcohol (3.05) and C22 Alcohol (3.60)
Results and discussion
Adsorption coefficientopen allclose all
- Key result
- Type:
- log Koc
- Value:
- >= 4.1 - <= 4.69
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- % Org. carbon:
- >= 0.63 - <= 1.95
- Key result
- Type:
- Koc
- Value:
- >= 12 472 - <= 49 400 dimensionless
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- % Org. carbon:
- >= 0.63 - <= 1.95
- Key result
- Type:
- Kd
- Value:
- >= 243.2 - <= 321.1 other: cm3/g
- Temp.:
- 20 °C
- % Org. carbon:
- >= 0.63 - <= 1.95
Results: Batch equilibrium or other method
- Adsorption and desorption constants:
- See in tables below (other information on results) and in the report attached
- Recovery of test material:
- See in tables below (other information on results) and in the report attached
- Transformation products:
- no
- Details on results (Batch equilibrium method):
- See in tables below (other information on results and overall remarks) and in the report attached.
The relative homogeneity of the results between the different components of the test item “Reaction products between C20/22 (even numbered) alcohol and phosphoric anhydride suggest that the end points determined at this step for each compound can be extrapolate to the test Item itself and those for all the soils.
The Log Koc range of the Reaction products between C20/22 (even numbered) alcohol and phosphoric anhydride is 4.12 to 4.67 depending on the soil.
According the OECD 106 guideline, in general chemicals with Kd ≤ 1 cm3.g-1 are considered to be qualitatively mobile. Whatever the type of soil, the Kd is > 1 cm3.g-1 for both compounds. As C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol are relevant and representative constituents of test item. Therefore, the test item is not considered to be qualitatively mobile.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Adsorption Kinetic
The tables below summarize the results of Kd, Koc and Log Koc for the five soils
Matrice | Soil 6S (Clay) | Soil 2.1 (Sand) | ||||||
Kd (cm3.g-1) | % OC | Koc | Log Koc | Kd (cm3.g-1) | % OC | Koc | Log Koc | |
C20 Alcohol | 228.5 | 1.70 | 13441 | 4.13 | 207.1 | 0.63 | 32872 | 4.52 |
C22 Alcohol | 278.5 | 1.70 | 16382 | 4.21 | 262.0 | 0.63 | 41587 | 4.62 |
Matrice | Soil 2.2 (Loamy sand) | Soil 2.3 (Sandy loam) | ||||||
Kd (cm3.g-1) | % OC | Koc | Log Koc | Kd (cm3.g-1) | % OC | Koc | Log Koc | |
C20 Alcohol | 248.7 | 1.61 | 15447 | 4.19 | 282.2 | 0.65 | 43415 | 4.64 |
C22 Alcohol | 317.1 | 1.61 | 19696 | 4.29 | 321.1 | 0.65 | 49400 | 4.69 |
Matrice | Soil 2.4 (Loamy ) | |||
Kd (cm3.g-1) | % OC | Koc | Log Koc | |
C20 Alcohol | 243.2 | 1.95 | 12472 | 4.10 |
C22 Alcohol | 262.4 | 1.95 | 13456 | 4.13 |
Whatever the kind of soils with a soil:solution ratio 1:100 (very low), both compounds were strongly adsorbed the soil after 0.25 hour of exposure. During the kinetic, the percentage of adsorption is stable for both compounds.
Kinetic curves were established in order to define the distribution coefficient Kd and to determinate the organic carbon normalized adsorption coefficient Koc for C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol for different kind of soils.
In addition, the relative homogeneity of the results between the different components of the test item “Reaction products between C20/22 ‘even numbered) alcohol and phosphoric anhydride suggest that the end points determined at this step for each compound can be extrapolate to the test Item itself and those for all the soils.
The Log Koc range of the Reaction products between C20/22 (even numbered) alcohol and phosphoric anhydride is 4.12 to 4.67 depending on the soil.
According the OECD 106 guideline, in general chemicals with Kd ≤ 1 cm3.g-1 are considered to be qualitatively mobile. Whatever the type of soil, the Kd is > 1 cm3.g-1 for both compounds. As C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol are relevant and representative constituents of test item. Therefore, the test item is not considered to be qualitatively mobile.
The mobility classification was developed by FAO in order to describe the compound’s sorption using Koc values. (FAO, 2000; USEPA, 2006).
According to the FAO Mobility classification based on Koc, a mobility classification of test item can be performed. The test item is considered to be hardly mobile in the following soil texture (USDA): clay, sandy loam, loamy sand, and loam.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Whatever the kind of soils with a soil:solution ratio 1:100 (very low), both compounds were strongly adsorbed the soil after 0.25 hour of exposure. During the kinetic, the percentage of adsorption is stable for both compounds.
Kinetic curves were established in order to define the distribution coefficient Kd and to determinate the organic carbon normalized adsorption coefficient Koc for C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol for different kind of soils.
In addition, the relative homogeneity of the results between the different components of the test item “Reaction products between C20/22 ‘even numbered) alcohol and phosphoric anhydride suggest that the end points determined at this step for each compound can be extrapolate to the test Item itself and those for all the soils.
The Log Koc range of the Reaction products between C20/22 (even numbered) alcohol and phosphoric anhydride is 4.12 to 4.67 depending on the soil.
According the OECD 106 guideline, in general chemicals with Kd ≤ 1 cm3.g-1 are considered to be qualitatively mobile. Whatever the type of soil, the Kd is > 1 cm3.g-1 for both compounds. As C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol are relevant and representative constituents of test item. Therefore, the test item is not considered to be qualitatively mobile.
According to the FAO Mobility classification based on Koc, a mobility classification of test item can be performed. The test item is considered to be hardly mobile in the following soil texture (USDA): clay, sandy loam, loamy sand, and loam. - Executive summary:
The aim of this study was to estimate the adsorption/desorption behaviour of the test item “acetalization product between glucose and C20/22 (even numbered) – alcohol” on soils.
As the test item is an UVCB composed by different chemical structures, the experimentations were performed on one kind of classes of relevant and representative constituents (Alcohol) contained in the test item in agreement with the sponsor. These compounds are presented hereafter:
Compound to quantify Kind of classes of compound C20 Alcohol Alcohol C22 Alcohol Alcohol The results of this study are summarised below:
Validation of the GC/FID method for determination of C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol in the aqueous phase
The method was validated with regard to specificity, linearity, precision and accuracy (recovery rate).
Specificity:No interference was detected at the retention time of C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol, in GC/FID in blank matrix samples (soil 6S in solution with 0.01 M CaCl2) extracted with ethyl acetate (the retention times of C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol were identified with the analytical reference item).
Linearity: Linearity (response function) was studied by carrying out 10 calibration spots with single determination, over a concentration range from 1.4 to 240 mg/L for the compounds C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol. A linear regression and its correlation coefficient were calculated. Both calibrations were found to be linear, with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.99 or greater.
Precision and accuracy: Precision and accuracy were studied by spiking 2 * 5 blank matrix samples at 2 fortification levels (LOQ: 0.15 mg/L and 10 mg/L) for the compounds C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol. Precision was assessed through RSD calculations and Accuracy was assessed through mean recovery calculations. For C20 Alcohol, Mean recovery rate were 98.67 % (n = 10) with a RSDr of 5.053% and with RSDR of 12.36% at 0.15 mg/L and 91.80 % (n=10) with a RSDr of 5.911 % and with RSDR of 6.868% at 10 mg/L. For C22 Alcohol, Mean recovery rate were 97.47% (n = 10) with a RSDr of 5.496% and with RSDR of 5.496% at 0.15 mg/L and 87.00 % (n=10) with a RSDr of 7.379 % and with RSDR of 10.42% at 10 mg/L.
Conclusion: This analytical method for determination of C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol in aqueous phase was successfully validated and was fit to purpose.
Adsorption-Desorption using a batch equilibrium method on the test item “Reaction products between C20/22 (even numbered) alcohol and phosphoric anhydride
The adsorption/desorption characteristics of C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol were studied in five soils:
- Loamy Sand [pH 4.7; organic carbon 0.63 %],
- Sandy Loam [pH 5.6; organic carbon 1.61 %],
- Sandy loam [pH 7.3; organic carbon 0.65 %],
- Loam [pH 7.4; organic carbon 1.95%]
- Clay [pH 7.3; organic carbon 1.70 %].
Adsorption Kinetic
The adsorption phase of the study was carried out at a nomimal concentration of 10 mg/L with a soil/solution ratio 1:100. The samples were collected sequentially at 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2 and 4 hours for five soils. The test soils were equilibrated overnight before the day of experiment at ambient temperature (temperature between 20°C and 25 °C). The equilibrating solution used was 0.01 M CaCl2 solution with soil solution ratio of 1:100 for the five soils. The mixtures were separated by centrifugation and the aqueous phases were extracted with Ethyl acetate solvent. The organic phases were evaporated to dryness under nitrogen flux, the silylation reagents were added to the extracts and the supernatants were analysed by GC/FID.
All the experiments were performed in duplicate at laboratory ambient temperature (temperature between 20°C and 25°C).
Whatever the kind of soils with a soil:solution ratio 1:100 (very low), both compounds were strongly adsorbed the soil after 0.25 hour of exposure. During the kinetic, the percentage of adsorption is stable for both compounds
Kinetic curves were established in order to define the distribution coefficient Kd and to determinate the organic carbon normalized adsorption coefficient Koc for C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol for different kind of soils.
The tables (below) summarize the results of Kd ,Koc and Log Koc for the kind of soils:
Matrice Soil 6S (Clay) Soil 2.1 (Sand) Kd (cm3.g-1) % OC Koc Log Koc Kd (cm3.g-1) % OC Koc Log Koc C20 Alcohol 228.5 1.70 13441 4.13 207.1 0.63 32872 4.52 C22 Alcohol 278.5 1.70 16382 4.21 262.0 0.63 41587 4.62 Matrice Soil 2.2 (Loamy sand) Soil 2.3 (Sandy loam) Kd (cm3.g-1) % OC Koc Log Koc Kd (cm3.g-1) % OC Koc Log Koc C20 Alcohol 248.7 1.61 15447 4.19 282.2 0.65 43415 4.64 C22 Alcohol 317.1 1.61 19696 4.29 321.1 0.65 49400 4.69 Matrice Soil 2.4 (Loamy ) Kd (cm3.g-1) % OC Koc Log Koc C20 Alcohol 243.2 1.95 12472 4.10 C22 Alcohol 262.4 1.95 13456 4.13 In addition, the relative homogeneity of the results between the different components of the test item “Reaction products between C20/22 (even numbered) alcohol and phosphoric anhydride suggest that the end points determined at this step for each compound can be extrapolate to the test Item itself and those for all the soils.
The Log Koc range of the Reaction products between C20/22 (even numbered) alcohol and phosphoric anhydride is 4.12 to 4.67 depending on the soil.
According the OECD 106 guideline, in general chemicals with Kd ≤ 1 cm3.g-1 are considered to be qualitatively mobile. Whatever the type of soil, the Kd is > 1 cm3.g-1 for both compounds. As C20 Alcohol and C22 Alcohol are relevant and representative constituents of test item. Therefore, the test item is not considered to be qualitatively mobile.
The mobility classification was developed by FAO in order to describe the compound’s sorption using Koc values. (FAO, 2000; USEPA, 2006).
According to the FAO Mobility classification based on Koc, a mobility classification of test item can be performed. The test item is considered to be hardly mobile in the following soil texture (USDA): clay, sandy loam, loamy sand, and loam.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
Although ECHA is providing a lot of online material in your language, part of this page is only in English. More about ECHA’s multilingual practice.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
the-echa-website-uses-cookies
find-out-more-on how-we-use-cookies