Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 296-719-4 | CAS number: 93028-28-5
Boiling point
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- boiling point
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- The justification for use of QSAR is attached.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: QSAR
- Deviations:
- not applicable
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Quantitative Structural-Activity Relationship based upon chemical structure devised from the SMILES code
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Other quality assurance:
- other: ISO 9001
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Key result
- Boiling pt.:
- 1 028.71 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR estimation, information on atmospheric pressure and decomposition are not available.
- Conclusions:
- The boiling point is considered to be 1028.71°C based on calculation by the EPI modelling programme
- Executive summary:
Removal of mineral oil is not possible without degrading the chemical structureof the substance. It was therefore considered acceptable to create a weight of evidence approach based upon Quantitative Structural-Activity Relationship (QSAR). The QSAR model of choice was the EPI Suite v4.0 published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, which has estimated the boiling point to be 1028.71°C
- Endpoint:
- boiling point
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- The justification for use of QSAR is attached.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: QSAR
- Deviations:
- not applicable
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Quantitative Structural-Activity Relationship based upon chemical structure devised from the SMILES code
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Other quality assurance:
- other: ISO 9001
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Key result
- Boiling pt.:
- 1 075.13 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR estimation, information on atmospheric pressure and decomposition are not available.
- Conclusions:
- The boiling point is considered to be 1075.13°C based on calculation by the EPI modelling programme
- Executive summary:
Removal of mineral oil is not possible without degrading the chemical structureof the substance. It was therefore considered acceptable to create a weight of evidence approach based upon Quantitative structural-Activity Relationship (QSAR). The QSAR model of choice was the EPI Suite v4.0 published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, which has estimated the boiling point to be 1075.13 °C
- Endpoint:
- boiling point
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- The justification for use of QSAR is attached.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: QSAR
- Deviations:
- not applicable
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Quantitative Structural-Activity Relationship based upon chemical structure devised from the SMILES code
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Other quality assurance:
- other: ISO 9001
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Key result
- Boiling pt.:
- 1 121.54 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR estimation, information on atmospheric pressure and decomposition are not available.
- Conclusions:
- The boiling point is considered to be 1121.54°C based on calculation by the EPI modelling programme
- Executive summary:
Removal of mineral oil is not possible without degrading the chemical structureof the substance. It was therefore considered acceptable to create a weight of evidence approach based upon Quantitative Structural-Activity Relationship (QSAR). The QSAR model of choice was the EPI Suite v4.0 published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, which has estimated the boiling point to be 1121.54°C
Referenceopen allclose all
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Boiling point at 101 325 Pa:
- 1 059.65 °C
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
