Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 257-854-4 | CAS number: 52333-30-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Study initiation date - 08 September 2015; Experiment start date - 09 September 2015; Experiment end date - 29 October 2015; Study completion date - 28 November 2015.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 221 (Lemna sp. Growth Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Identification: FAT 21021/E TE
Description: Solid
Appearance: Powder
Colour: Red
Batch number: 72 (Thailand)
CAS No: 52333-30-9
Purity: >75 %
Molecular weight: 1083.06 g/mol
Expiry date: 16 February 2020
Stability of test item: Stable
Storage conditions: Room temperature in the dark - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- From the stock (147 mg/L) following concentrations were prepared. All the required test concentrations were prepared for 600 ml. For 0.006, 0.06, 0.6, 6, 30 and 60 mg/600 ml, 41 µl, 408 µl, 4.08 ml, 40.82 ml, 204.08 and 408.16 ml was taken from stock and made up to 600 ml with 20X-AAP medium, respectively. For Control, 20X-AAP medium was used. For range finding experiment the concentrations selected were 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 50 and 100 mg/L which is equivalent to 0.006, 0.06, 0.6, 6, 30 and 60 mg /600 ml, respectively. For Limit concentration 100 mg/L which is equivalent to 130 mg/1300 ml, 884.35 ml was taken from the stock solution and made up to 1300 ml with 20X-AAP medium. For Control, 20X-AAP medium was used.
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- SOLUBILITY ANALYSIS
100 mg of the test item was dissolved and made up to 1 L with 20X-AAP medium. Test item particles were settled down. Acetone and Dimethyl formamide was used to check the solubility but the test item was not found to be soluble. Then lesser quantity of the test item (approximately 1 mg) was made up to 1 L with 20X-AAP medium, test solution was kept on hot plate and magnetic stirrer for approximately 30 minutes, but the test item particles were settled down. The test solution was ultrasonicated approximately for 30 minutes. However, there was no impact on the solubility of the test item. Therefore, based on the sponsor communication, WAF procedure was carried out as follows: 1.0003 g of the test item was dissolved and made up to 1 L with 20X-AAP medium. The test dispersion was ultrasonicated for 15 minutes and kept on continuous stirring for 5 days (at room temperature in the dark). After stirring, the dispersion was left to settle for approximately 60 minutes and the same was filtered through a preconditioned filter paper. The undiluted filtrate was tested as WAF and it was recorded that 147 mg/Las the limit of solubility of the test item in the 20X-AAP medium. - Test organisms (species):
- Lemna gibba
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Strain: Lemna gibba (Duckweed)
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): In-house culture, RCC Laboratories India Private Limited (Originally procured by Department of Plant Biology & Plant Biotechnology Madras Christian College, Chennai). - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 7 d
- Post exposure observation period:
- Frond number in each replicate was counted on days ‘0’, ‘3’, ‘5’ and ‘7’.
A representative sample (approximately 12 fronds) of pre-culture was checked for its average dry weight on day ‘0’ of exposure and dry weight of plant material from each test and control vessel on day ‘7’ of exposure.
Observation was performed on day ‘0’, ‘3’, ‘5’ and ‘7’ for the abnormal appearance or any developmental changes due to the effect of the test item (if any). - Test temperature:
- Start of the test:
Control: 22.9 °C
Treatment: 22.9 °C
End of the test:
Control: 24.5-24.8 °C
Treatment: 25.1-25.4 °C - pH:
- Start of the test
Control: 7.50
Treatment: 7.43
End of the test
Control: 8.70-8.73
Treatment: 8.64-8.69 - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 500 ml Glass Beaker
- No. of organisms per vessel: 12 fronds (3 plants)
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): Limit test - 6 replicates
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): Control - 6 Replicates.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: yes
- Adjustment of pH: Start of the test
- Photoperiod: Continuous Light
- Light intensity and quality: 8440-8680 Lux
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
-For Limit Test 1.0001 g of the test item was dissolved and made up to 1L of 20X-AAP medium in a 1L standard flask and then the test dispersion was kept on the magnetic stirrer up to 5 days. The test dispersion that was kept on the magnetic stirrer was removed and allowed to settle down for approximately one hour. Then the test dispersion was filtered through the filter paper and the filtrate was used for the dose formulation, which is should be 147 mg/L concentration as per the previous analytical results.
For Limit concentration 100 mg/L which is equivalent to 130mg/1300ml, From the stock solution, 884.35 ml was taken and made up to 1300 ml with 20X-AAP medium. For Control, 20X-AAP medium was used. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 3,5-Dichlorophenol
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- yield
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- yield
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Details on results:
- RANGE FINDING EXPERIMENT
BASED ON FROND NUMBERS: The percent inhibition on the average specific growth rate on day '7' for the test concentrations of 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 50 and 100 mg/L was calculated as 0.02 %, 0.02 %, 0.11 %, 0.16 %, 0.16 and 0.20 %, respectively.
BASED ON FROND DRY WEIGHT:
The percent inhibition on the average growth rate on day '7' for the concentration of 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 50 and 100 mg/L was calculated as 0.44 %, 0.22 %, 0.44 %, 0.22 %, 0.44 and 0.44 %, respectively. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- ErC50 of 3,5-Dichlorophenol based upon the frond numbers observed for a period of ‘7’ days for Lemna gibba was calculated as 4.30 mg/L with a lower confidence limit of 4.15 mg/L and the upper confidence limit of 4.46 mg/L.
EyC50 of 3,5-Dichlorophenol based upon the frond numbers observed for a period of ‘7’ days for Lemna gibba was calculated as 2.38 mg/L with a lower confidence limit of 2.29 mg/L and the upper confidence limit of 2.48 mg/L.
ErC50 of 3,5-Dichlorophenol based upon the frond dry weight observed for a period of ‘7’ days for Lemna gibba was calculated as 3.02 mg/L with a lower confidence limit of 2.89 mg/L and the upper confidence limit of 3.16 mg/L.
EyC50 of 3,5-Dichlorophenol based upon the frond dry weight observed for a period of ‘7’ days for Lemna gibba was calculated as 1.53 mg/L with a lower confidence limit of 1.46 mg/L and the upper confidence limit of 1.59 mg/L. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Mean coefficient of variation of average specific growth rate in replicate control and treated cultures were calculated. No analysis was done as the study is concluded with the Limit Test.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- ErC50 of FAT 21021/E based upon the frond numbers observed for a period of ‘7’ days for Lemna gibba was found to be > 100 mg/L.
EyC50 of FAT 21021/E based upon the frond numbers observed for a period of ‘7’ days for Lemna gibba was found to be >100 mg/L.
ErC50 of FAT 21021/E based upon the frond dry weight observed for a period of ‘7’ days for Lemna gibba was found to be >100 mg/L.
EyC50 of FAT 21021/E based upon the frond dry weight observed for a period of ‘7’ days for Lemna gibba was found to be >100 mg/L.
The no observed effect concentration (NOEC) was calculated as >100 mg/L. - Executive summary:
An GLP-compliant OECD guideline 221 study was performed to determine the effects of the test material FAT 21021/E. The exponentially growing culture of Lemna gibba (Duckweed) with an observation period of ‘7’ days. The effect of test item on the growth of the Lemna gibba culture compared with control was determined and the concentration that inhibited growth rate by 50 % (ErC50) and the concentration that inhibited yield by 50 % (EyC50) each of which in turn based upon frond number and frond dry weight were calculated. Based on the solubility of test item, 20X- AAP medium was selected as vehicle for dose formulation. For Limit concentration, Lemna gibba (Duckweed) were exposed to the test item (FAT 21021/E) at test concentration of 100 mg/L. Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF) was prepared and it was analytically recorded that 147 mg/L as the limit of solubility of the test item in the 20X-AAP medium. The WAF filtrate (147 mg/L) was considered as the stock from which 100 mg/L was prepared. After exposure, Lemna gibba was observed for frond count on days ‘3’, ‘5’ and ‘7’. Dry weight of the fronds were recorded at start (pre-culture representative samples) and at the end of the test. Fronds were observed for their appearance on days ‘3’, ‘5’ and ‘7’. All fronds were found normal and healthy in all replicates of control and test concentration.
Frond Numbers:
From the average specific growth rate recorded with the test concentration 100 mg/L the test concentration that inhibited 50% growth (ErC50) was calculated as >100 mg/L. The percent inhibition on the average specific growth rate on day ‘7’ for the test concentration of 100 mg/L was calculated as 0.02 %. From the yield recorded with the different test concentration, 100 mg/L, the concentration that inhibited 50 % yield (EyC50) was calculated as >100 mg/L. The percent inhibition on the yield on day ‘7’ for the test concentration of 100 mg/L was calculated as 0.07 %. The no observed effect concentration (NOEC) was calculated as >100 mg/L.
Frond Dry Weight:
From the average specific growth rate recorded with the test concentration, 100 mg/L, the concentration that inhibited 50% growth (ErC50) was calculated as > 100 mg/L. The percent inhibition on the average growth rate on day ‘7’ for the concentration of 100 mg/L was calculated as 0.21 %. From the yield recorded with the test concentration,100 mg/L the concentration that inhibited 50 % yield (EyC50) was calculated as >100 mg/L. The percent inhibition on the yield on day ‘7’ for the test concentration of 100 mg/L was calculated as 0.53 %. The no observed effect concentration (NOEC) was calculated as >100 mg/L.
Reference
Description of key information
The average specific growth rate (frond number) had an EC50 of >100 mg/L. The NOEC was 32 mg/L and the LOEC was 100 mg/L.
The average specific growth rate (dry weight) had an EC50 of >100 mg/L. The NOEC was 100 mg/L.
The yield (frond number) had an EC50 of >100 mg/L. The NOEC was 32 mg/L and the LOEC was 100 mg/L.
The yield (dry weight) had an EC50 of >100 mg/L. The NOEC was 100 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater plants:
- 100 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater plants:
- 100 mg/L
Additional information
A GLP-compliant OECD guideline 221 study was performed to determine the effects of the test material FAT 21021/E. The exponentially growing culture of Lemna gibba (Duckweed) with an observation period of ‘7’ days. The effect of test item on the growth of the Lemna gibba culture compared with control was determined and the concentration that inhibited growth rate by 50 % (ErC50) and the concentration that inhibited yield by 50 % (EyC50) each of which in turn based upon frond number and frond dry weight were calculated. Based on the solubility of test item, 20X- AAP medium was selected as vehicle for dose formulation. For Limit concentration, Lemna gibba (Duckweed) were exposed to the test item (FAT 21021/E) at test concentration of 100 mg/L. Water Accommodated Fraction (WAF) was prepared and it was analytically recorded that 147 mg/L as the limit of solubility of the test item in the 20X-AAP medium. The WAF filtrate (147 mg/L) was considered as the stock from which 100 mg/L was prepared. After exposure, Lemna gibba was observed for frond count on days ‘3’, ‘5’ and ‘7’. Dry weight of the fronds was recorded at start (pre-culture representative samples) and at the end of the test. Fronds were observed for their appearance on days ‘3’, ‘5’ and ‘7’. All fronds were found normal and healthy in all replicates of control and test concentration.
Frond Numbers:
From the average specific growth rate recorded with the test concentration 100mg/L the test concentration that inhibited 50 % growth (ErC50) was calculated as > 100 mg/L. The percent inhibition on the average specific growth rate on day ‘7’ for the test concentration of 100 mg/L was calculated as 0.02 %. From the yield recorded with the different test concentration,100 mg/L, the concentration that inhibited 50% yield (EyC50) was calculated as >100mg/L. The percent inhibition on the yield on day ‘7’ for the test concentration of 100 mg/L was calculated as 0.07 %. The no observed effect concentration (NOEC) was calculated as >100 mg/L.
Frond Dry Weight:
From the average specific growth rate recorded with the test concentration, 100 mg/L, the concentration that inhibited 50 % growth (ErC50) was calculated as > 100 mg/L. The percent inhibition on the average growth rate on day ‘7’ for the concentration of 100 mg/L was calculated as 0.21 %. From the yield recorded with the test concentration,100 mg/L the concentration that inhibited 50 % yield (EyC50) was calculated as >100 mg/L. The percent inhibition on the yield on day ‘7’ for the test concentration of 100 mg/L was calculated as 0.53 %. The no observed effect concentration (NOEC) was calculated as >100 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.