Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 221-490-4 | CAS number: 3118-97-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute toxicity: oral
LD50 was estimated to be 2998 mg/kg bw when rats were orally exposed with 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol.
Acute toxicity: inhalation
the study need not be
conducted because exposure of humans via inhalation is not likely taking
into account the vapour pressure of the substance and/or the possibility
of exposure to aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size.
Acute toxicity: dermal
Acute dermal LD50 value of the test substance 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol is estimated to be 2332.617 mg/kg bw to rats.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is predicted using OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 and the supporting QMRF report has been attached
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Prediction is done using QSAR Toolbox version 3.3
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- other: No data
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): C.I. Solvent orange 7
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): C18H16N2O
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): 276.337 g/mol
- Smiles notation (if other than submission substance): c12c(\N=N/c3c(cc(C)cc3)C)c(ccc1cccc2)O
- InChl (if other than submission substance): 1S/C18H16N2O/c1-12-7-9-16(13(2)11-12)19-20-18-15-6-4-3-5-14(15)8-10-17(18)21/h3-11,21H,1-2H3
- Structural formula attached as image file (if other than submission substance): No data available
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- No data available
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on oral exposure:
- not specified
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- not specified
- Statistics:
- not specified
- Preliminary study:
- not specified
- Key result
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 2 998 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: 50 % mortality observed
- Mortality:
- not specified
- Clinical signs:
- other: not specified
- Gross pathology:
- not specified
- Other findings:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 5 based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- LD50 was estimated to be 2998 mg/kg bw when rats were orally exposed with 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol.
- Executive summary:
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated for 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol. The LD50 was estimated to be 2998 mg/kg bw when rats were orally exposed with 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol.
Reference
The
prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following
descriptors: LD50
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 6 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
((((((((("a"
or "b" or "c" or "d" or "e" or "f" )
and ("g"
and (
not "h")
)
)
and ("i"
and (
not "j")
)
)
and ("k"
and (
not "l")
)
)
and ("m"
and (
not "n")
)
)
and ("o"
and (
not "p")
)
)
and "q" )
and "r" )
and ("s"
and "t" )
)
Domain
logical expression index: "a"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as SN1 AND SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion
formation AND SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Aromatic azo by DNA
binding by OECD
Domain
logical expression index: "b"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Strong binder, OH group by
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "c"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alkyl arenes AND Aryl AND Azo
AND Fused carbocyclic aromatic AND Naphtalene AND Phenol by Organic
Functional groups
Domain
logical expression index: "d"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alkyl arenes AND Aryl AND Azo
AND Fused carbocyclic aromatic AND Naphtalene AND Overlapping groups AND
Phenol by Organic Functional groups (nested)
Domain
logical expression index: "e"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alcohol, olefinic attach [-OH]
AND Aliphatic Carbon [CH] AND Aliphatic Carbon [-CH2-] AND Aliphatic
Carbon [-CH3] AND Aliphatic Nitrogen, one aromatic attach [-N] AND
Aromatic Carbon [C] AND Azo [-N=N-] AND Hydroxy, aromatic attach [-OH]
AND Olefinic carbon [=CH- or =C<] AND Oxygen, one aromatic attach [-O-]
by Organic functional groups (US EPA)
Domain
logical expression index: "f"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aromatic compound AND Azo
compound AND Hydroxy compound AND Phenol by Organic functional groups,
Norbert Haider (checkmol)
Domain
logical expression index: "g"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by
OASIS v.1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "h"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as AN2 OR AN2 >> Shiff base
formation after aldehyde release OR AN2 >> Shiff base formation after
aldehyde release >> Specific Acetate Esters OR Non-covalent interaction
OR Non-covalent interaction >> DNA intercalation OR Non-covalent
interaction >> DNA intercalation >> DNA Intercalators with Carboxamide
Side Chain OR Non-covalent interaction >> DNA intercalation >>
Fused-Ring Primary Aromatic Amines OR Radical OR Radical >> Radical
mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) OR Radical >> Radical mechanism
via ROS formation (indirect) >> Fused-Ring Primary Aromatic Amines OR
Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Nitro
Azoarenes OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect)
>> Nitroaniline Derivatives OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS
formation (indirect) >> Nitroarenes with Other Active Groups OR Radical
>> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Nitrophenols,
Nitrophenyl Ethers and Nitrobenzoic Acids OR SN1 OR SN1 >> Alkylation
after metabolically formed carbenium ion species OR SN1 >> Alkylation
after metabolically formed carbenium ion species >> Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbon Derivatives OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after carbenium
ion formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after carbenium ion
formation >> Specific Acetate Esters OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after
diazonium or carbenium ion formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after
diazonium or carbenium ion formation >> Nitroarenes with Other Active
Groups OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after metabolic nitrenium ion
formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after metabolic nitrenium ion
formation >> Fused-Ring Primary Aromatic Amines OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic
attack after reduction and nitrenium ion formation OR SN1 >>
Nucleophilic attack after reduction and nitrenium ion formation >> Nitro
Azoarenes OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after reduction and nitrenium
ion formation >> Nitroaniline Derivatives OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack
after reduction and nitrenium ion formation >> Nitroarenes with Other
Active Groups OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic attack after reduction and
nitrenium ion formation >> Nitrophenols, Nitrophenyl Ethers and
Nitrobenzoic Acids OR SN2 OR SN2 >> Acylation OR SN2 >> Acylation >>
Specific Acetate Esters OR SN2 >> Alkylation, direct acting epoxides and
related after P450-mediated metabolic activation OR SN2 >> Alkylation,
direct acting epoxides and related after P450-mediated metabolic
activation >> Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Derivatives OR SN2 >>
Nucleophilic substitution at sp3 Carbon atom OR SN2 >> Nucleophilic
substitution at sp3 Carbon atom >> Specific Acetate Esters OR SN2 >> SN2
attack on activated carbon Csp3 or Csp2 OR SN2 >> SN2 attack on
activated carbon Csp3 or Csp2 >> Nitroarenes with Other Active Groups by
DNA binding by OASIS v.1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "i"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Not possible to classify
according to these rules by DPRA Cysteine peptide depletion
Domain
logical expression index: "j"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as High reactive OR High reactive
>> alpha,beta-carbonyl compounds with polarized multiple bonds OR
Moderate reactive OR Moderate reactive >> Activated 1,3,5-triazine
derivatives OR Moderate reactive >> Mono-methacrylic acid esters by DPRA
Cysteine peptide depletion
Domain
logical expression index: "k"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Strong binder, OH group by
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "l"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non binder, impaired OH or NH2
group OR Non binder, MW>500 OR Non binder, non cyclic structure OR Non
binder, without OH or NH2 group OR Very strong binder, OH group by
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "m"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Protein
binding by OASIS v1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "n"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Acylation OR Acylation >> Ester
aminolysis OR Acylation >> Ester aminolysis >> Amides OR Michael
Addition OR Michael Addition >> Michael addition on conjugated systems
with electron withdrawing group OR Michael Addition >> Michael addition
on conjugated systems with electron withdrawing group >>
alpha,beta-Carbonyl compounds with polarized double bonds OR
Nucleophilic addition OR Nucleophilic addition >> Addition to
carbon-hetero double bonds OR Nucleophilic addition >> Addition to
carbon-hetero double bonds >> Ketones by Protein binding by OASIS v1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "o"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Protein
binding by OECD
Domain
logical expression index: "p"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Acylation OR Acylation >> Direct
Acylation Involving a Leaving group OR Acylation >> Direct Acylation
Involving a Leaving group >> Acetates by Protein binding by OECD
Domain
logical expression index: "q"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Not bioavailable by Lipinski
Rule Oasis ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "r"
Similarity
boundary:Target:
Cc1ccc(N=Nc2c3ccccc3ccc2O)c(C)c1
Threshold=60%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization
Domain
logical expression index: "s"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= 6.2
Domain
logical expression index: "t"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 6.96
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 998 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimisch 2 and from OECD QSAR toolbox
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Data waiving:
- other justification
- Justification for data waiving:
- the study does not need to be conducted because exposure of humans via inhalation is not likely taking into account the vapour pressure of the substance and/or the possibility of exposure to aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is predicted by OECD QSAR Toolbox version 3.3. The supporting QMRF report has been attached
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Data is predicted by OECD QSAR Toolbox version 3.3.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Type of coverage:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on dermal exposure:
- Not specified
- Duration of exposure:
- Not specified
- Doses:
- Not specified
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Not specified
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- Not specified
- Key result
- Sex:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 2 332.617 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- Not specified
- Clinical signs:
- other: Not specified
- Gross pathology:
- Not specified
- Other findings:
- Not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not irritating
- Conclusions:
- Acute dermal LD50 value of the test substance 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol is estimated to be 2332.617 mg/kg bw to rbbits.
- Executive summary:
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated for 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol. The acute dermal LD50 value of the test substance 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol is estimated to be 2332.617 mg/kg bw to rabbits.
Reference
The
prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following
descriptors: LD50
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 5 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
((((((("a"
or "b" or "c" )
and ("d"
and (
not "e")
)
)
and ("f"
and (
not "g")
)
)
and ("h"
and (
not "i")
)
)
and ("j"
and (
not "k")
)
)
and "l" )
and ("m"
and "n" )
)
Domain
logical expression index: "a"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as SN1 AND SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion
formation AND SN1 >> Nitrenium Ion formation >> Aromatic azo by DNA
binding by OECD
Domain
logical expression index: "b"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Strong binder, OH group by
Estrogen Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "c"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Phenols by Aquatic toxicity
classification by ECOSAR
Domain
logical expression index: "d"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by
OASIS v.1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "e"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non-covalent interaction OR
Non-covalent interaction >> DNA intercalation OR Non-covalent
interaction >> DNA intercalation >> DNA Intercalators with Carboxamide
Side Chain OR Radical OR Radical >> Radical mechanism by ROS formation
OR Radical >> Radical mechanism by ROS formation >> Polynitroarenes OR
Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) OR Radical >>
Radical mechanism via ROS formation (indirect) >> Nitrophenols,
Nitrophenyl Ethers and Nitrobenzoic Acids OR SN1 OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic
attack after reduction and nitrenium ion formation OR SN1 >>
Nucleophilic attack after reduction and nitrenium ion formation >>
Nitrophenols, Nitrophenyl Ethers and Nitrobenzoic Acids OR SN1 >>
Nucleophilic attack after reduction and nitrenium ion formation >>
Polynitroarenes by DNA binding by OASIS v.1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "f"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non-Metals by Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "g"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alkali Earth OR Halogens by
Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "h"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Phenols by Skin
irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "i"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amines OR Ketones by
Skin irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "j"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Protein
binding alerts for Chromosomal aberration by OASIS v1.1
Domain
logical expression index: "k"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as AN2 OR AN2 >> Michael-type
addition to quinoid structures OR AN2 >> Michael-type addition to
quinoid structures >> Phenols by Protein binding alerts for Chromosomal
aberration by OASIS v1.1
Domain
logical expression index: "l"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as High (Class III) by Toxic hazard
classification by Cramer (original) ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "m"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= 4.23
Domain
logical expression index: "n"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 13.4
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 332.617 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimisch 2 and from OECD QSAR toolbox
Additional information
Acute oral toxicity:
In different studies, 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol (CAS no 3118-97-6) has been investigated for acute oral toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in vivo experimental and estimations in rodents, i.e. most commonly in mice and rats for 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol along with on structurally similar read across substance1-[(2-methoxyphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol (CAS no 1229-55-6)and Sudan orange R (CAS 842-07-9).The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental data.
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated for 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol. The LD50 was estimated to be 2998 mg/kg bw when rats were orally exposed with 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol.
In another experimental study summarized by Commission of The European Communities (Directorate-General Telecommunications, Information Industries and Innovation; Batiment Jean Monnet, LUXEMBOURG, 1988), mice were treated with 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol orally. 50 % Mortality was observed in treated mice at 20,000 mg/kg bw. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be 20,000 mg/kg bw. When mice were treated with 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol orally.
Also it is further supported by experimental study conducted by Mayhewet al(American College of Toxicology, Part B.15 (Suppl 1),S43,1996) and given by NTRL (U.S. Army Medical Bioengineering Research and development Laboratory, 1986)on structurally similar read across substance 1-[(2-methoxyphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol (CAS no 1229-55-6), Fischer 344 male and female rats were treated Solvent Red 1 (1-[(2-methoxyphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol) in the concentration of 5000 mg/kg bw in corn oil orally by gavage. No mortality was observed in treated rat at 5000 mg/kg bw. Red colored urine and stool; loose stool; red stained fur in the perianal region, on the head and ventral portion of the body, on the muzzle and red colored stain on the tail of treated rat. Overall body weight gain was observed in treated rat. No gross pathological abnormal findings were observed in treated rat. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be > 5000 mg/kg bw when Fischer 344 male and female rats were treated Solvent Red 1 (1-[(2-methoxyphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol) orally.
Further supported by experimental study conducted by BSF Company (1977) on structurally similar read across substance Sudan orange R (RA CAS 842-07-9), acute oral toxicity was evaluated in rats by using Sudan orange R in the concentration of 10000 mg/kg bwas a 5-35% suspension in 0.5% aqueous CMC preparation orally by gavage and observed for 14 days. No mortality was observed in treated rat at 10000 mg/kg bw and orange discolored of skin, feces and urine were observed in treated rats. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be > 10000 mg/kg bw when rats were treated with Sudan orange R as a 5-35% suspension in 0.5% aqueous CMC preparation orally by gavage.
This further supported by experimental study conducted by National Toxicology Program (1982) and National Technical Information Service (1981) on structurally similar read across substance Sudan orange R (RA CAS 842-07-9), acute oral toxicity was evaluated in F344 male and female rats and B6C3F1 male and female mice were treated with C. I. Solvent Yellow 14 in the concentration of 0, 600, 1250, 2500, 5000 and 10000 mg/kg/day and 0, 1200, 2500, 5000, 1000 and 20000 mg/kg/day orally in feed and observed for 14 days. No effect on survival and signs of toxicity were observed in treated mice and rat. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be > 10000 mg/kg bw for rats and > 20000 ma/kg bw for mice when F344 male and female rats and B6C3F1 male and female mice were treated with C. I. Solvent Yellow 14 orally by feed.
Thus, based on the above studies and predictions on 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol and by applying weight of evidance, it can be concluded that LD50 value is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol can be “Not Classified” for acute oral toxicity.
Acute toxicity: inhalation
The study need not be
conducted because exposure of humans via inhalation is not likely taking
into account the vapour pressure of the substance and/or the possibility
of exposure to aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size.
Acute
toxicity: dermal
In
below summary, 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol (CAS No.-
3118-97-6) has been reviewed for acute dermal toxicity to a greater or
lesser extent. The studies are based on prediction for
1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol along with the study
available on structurally similar read across substances 2-Naphthalenol,
1-[[4-(phenylazo)phenyl]azo]-, ar',ar''-Me derivs (CAS No. –
70879-65-1) and Solvent Red 1 (1-[(2-methoxyphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol)
(CAS: 1229-55-6).
In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the acute oral toxicity was estimated for 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol. The acute dermal LD50 value of the test substance 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol is estimated to be 2332.617 mg/kg bw to rabbits.
This is supported by the acute dermal toxicity study of structurally similar read across substance 2-Naphthalenol, 1-[[4-(phenylazo)phenyl]azo]-, ar',ar''-Me derivs conducted by Sustainability Support Services (Europe) AB, at IIRT (2012), Wistar male and female rats were treated with 2-Naphthalenol, 1-[[4-(phenylazo)phenyl]azo]-, ar',ar''-Me derivs in the concentration of 2000 mg/kg bw by dermal application. No mortality and any clinical signs of toxicity were observed throughout the observation period of 14 days in treated rats. The body weight of each animal recorded on day 0, 7th and 14th showed normal increase and there was no significant increase or decrease in weight was recorded. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be > 2000 mg/kg bw when Wistar male and female rats were treated with 2-Naphthalenol, 1-[[4-(phenylazo)phenyl]azo]-, ar',ar''-Me derivs by dermal application.
Moreover, in the study conducted byGunda Reddy et al.,( International Journal of Toxicology Vol 15, Issue 1_suppl, pp. S43 - S44, 1996), New Zealand White male and female rabbits were treated with Solvent Red 1 (1-[(2-methoxyphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol) in the concentration of 5000 mg/kg bw in physiological saline applied on dorsal and lateral trunk (approximately 10% of the body surface area) of each animal was clipped free of hair with Oster electric clippers equipped with a number 40 (surgical) blade for 24 hours. No mortality was observed in treated rabbits. Red stain on teat site, feet and head discolored red in treated male and female rabbits. Few stools and loose stool were observed in treated male rabbits. Overall body weight increased was observed in treated male and female rabbits. Red discoloration of treated skin, red discoloration of fur, a liver with a dark red discoloration, and 2 lungs with red discoloration was observed in treated male and female rabbits. Therefore, LD50 was considered to be > 2000 mg/kg bw when New Zealand White male and female rabbits were treated with Solvent Red 1 (1-[(2-methoxyphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol) by dermal application for 24 hours.
Thus, based on the above studies and predictions on 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol (Sudan II) and its read across substances, it can be concluded that LD50 value is > 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, it infers that 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol (CAS No. 3118-97-6) does not classify as an acute dermal toxicant i.e it is acutely non toxic to animals.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above studies and predictions on 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol, it can be concluded that LD50 value is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw. Thus comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, 1-[(2,4-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl]-2-naphthol can be “Not Classified” for acute oral as well as dermal toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.