Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
23-28th January 2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
Please refer to the Read-Across justification document enclosed in Chapter 13 for more details
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identification:
LME 11311
Batch:
Ua05 (258)
Purity:
99%
Molecular Weight:
292.38 g.mol-1
Physical state/Appearance:
Yellow solid
Expiry Date:
01 November 2023
Storage Conditions:
Room temperature in the dark
Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Details on test system:
Supplier:
EpiSkin Laboratories, Lyon, France

Date received:
22 January 2019

EpiSkinTM Tissues (0.38cm2) lot number:
19-EKIN-004

Maintenance Medium lot number:
19-MAIN3-003

Assay Medium lot number:
19-ESSC-003
Amount/concentration applied:
2 mL of maintenance medium, warmed to approximately 37 °C, was pipetted into the second column of 3 wells of the 12-well plate.
Triplicate tissues were treated with the test item for an exposure period of 15 minutes. The test item was applied topically to the corresponding tissues ensuring uniform covering. 5 μL of sterile distilled water was topically applied to the epidermal surface in order to improve contact between the test item and the epidermis. 1 disc of the test item was then applied to the epidermal surface. Triplicate tissues treated with 10 μL of DPBS served as the negative controls and triplicate tissues treated with 10 μL of SDS 5% w/v served as the positive controls. To ensure satisfactory contact with the positive control item the SDS solution was spread over the entire surface of the epidermis using a pipette tip (taking particular care to cover the center).
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Triplicate tissues were treated with the test item for an exposure period of 15 minutes.
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
At the end of the exposure period, each tissue was removed from the well using forceps and rinsed using a wash bottle containing DPBS with Ca++ and Mg++. Rinsing was achieved by filling and emptying each tissue insert for approximately 40 seconds using a constant soft stream of DPBS to gently remove any residual test item. The rinsed tissues were transferred to the second column of 3 wells containing 2 mL of maintenance medium in each well. The rinsed tissues were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in air for 42 hours.
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
3.2.1 Negative Control
Information as provided by the Supplier.
Identification:
Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) with Ca++ and Mg++
Batch:
1754643
Purity:
>98%
Expiry Date:
01 February 2019
Storage Conditions:
Approximately 4 °C in the dark
Supplier:
Gibco
3.2.2 Positive Control
Information as provided by the Supplier.
Identification:
Sodium dodecyl sulphate
Batch:
SLBT3991
Purity:
99.5%
Expiry Date:
01 March 2020
Storage Conditions:
Room temperature
Supplier:
Sigma-Aldrich
3.2.3 Preparation of Negative and Positive Control Items and MTT
The negative control item, Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS), was used as supplied.
The positive control item, Sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), was prepared as a 5% w/v aqueous solution. The positive control was formulated within 2 hours of being applied to the test system.
A 3 mg/mL MTT stock solution was prepared in DPBS. The stock solution was diluted to 0.3 mg/mL with assay medium when required.
A 0.04 N solution of hydrochloric acid in isopropanol was prepared when required.
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Value:
85.7
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid

 Item  Mean OD570 of triplicate tissues  +- SD of OD570  Relative individual tissue viability (%)  Relative Mean Viability (%)  +- SD of Relative Mean Viability (%)
 Negative Control Item     0.934  0.095

 89.0

102.0

109.0

 100  10.1
 Positive Control Item  0.032  0.012

 4.9

2.7

2.7

 3.4  1.3
 Test Item  0.800  0.039

83.8

82.8

90.5

 85.7  4.2

 

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item was classified as non-irritant. The following classification criteria apply:
EU CLP Not classified for Irritation.
UN GHS Not classified for Irritation (category 3 can not be determined).
Executive summary:

Introduction

The purpose of this test was to evaluate the skin irritation potential of the test item using the EPISKINTM reconstructed human epidermis model after a treatment period of 15 minutes followed by a post-exposure incubation period of 42 hours. The principle of the assay was based on the measurement of cytotoxicity in reconstructed human epidermal cultures following topical exposure to the test item by means of the colorimetric MTT reduction assay. Cell viability is measured by enzymatic reduction of the yellow MTT tetrazolium salt (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide) to a blue/purple formazan salt (within the mitochondria of viable cells) in the test item treated tissues relative to the negative controls.

Method

Triplicate tissues were treated with discs of the test item for an exposure period of 15 minutes. At the end of the exposure period the test item discs were removed from each tissue, and the tissue was rinsed before incubating for 42 hours. The test item was found to directly reduce MTT and therefore additional non-viable tissues were incorporated into the testing for correction purposes. At the end of the post-exposure incubation period each tissue was taken for MTT-loading. The maintenance medium from beneath each tissue was transferred to pre-labeled micro tubes and stored in a freezer for possible inflammatory mediator determination. After MTT-loading a total biopsy of each epidermis was made and placed into micro tubes containing acidified isopropanol for extraction of formazan crystals out of the MTT-loaded tissues.

At the end of the formazan extraction period each tube was mixed thoroughly and duplicate 200 μL samples were transferred to the appropriate wells of a pre-labeled 96-well plate. The optical density was measured at 570 nm.

Data are presented in the form of percentage viability (MTT reduction in the test item treated tissues relative to negative control tissues).

Results

The relative mean viability of the test item treated tissues was 85.7% after the 15-Minute exposure period and 42-Hours post-exposure incubation period.

Quality criteria: The quality criteria required for acceptance of results in the test were satisfied.

Conclusion

The test item was classified as non-irritant. The following classification criteria apply:

EU CLP Not classified for Irritation.

UN GHS Not classified for Irritation (category 3 can not be determined).

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
23-28th January 2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
Please refer to the Read Across Justification Document enclosed in Chapter 13 for further details.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identification:
LME 11194
Batch:
Xbm06
Purity:
99%
Molecular Weight:
328.42 g.mol-1
Physical state/Appearance:
Yellow solid
Expiry Date:
01 January 2022
Storage Conditions:
Room temperature in the dark
Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Details on test system:
Identification:
LME 11194
Batch:
Xbm06
Purity:
99%
Molecular Weight:
328.42 g.mol-1
Physical state/Appearance:
Yellow solid
Expiry Date:
01 January 2022
Storage Conditions:
Room temperature in the dark
Amount/concentration applied:
2 mL of maintenance medium, warmed to approximately 37 °C, was pipetted into the second column of 3 wells of the 12-well plate.
Triplicate tissues were treated with the test item for an exposure period of 15 minutes. The test item was applied topically to the corresponding tissues ensuring uniform covering. 5 μL of sterile distilled water was topically applied to the epidermal surface in order to improve contact between the test item and the epidermis. 1 disc of the test item was then applied to the epidermal surface. Triplicate tissues treated with 10 μL of DPBS served as the negative controls and triplicate tissues treated with 10 μL of SDS 5% w/v served as the positive controls. To ensure satisfactory contact with the positive control item the SDS solution was spread over the entire surface of the epidermis using a pipette tip (taking particular care to cover the center).
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Triplicate tissues were treated with the test item for an exposure period of 15 minutes.
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
At the end of the exposure period, each tissue was removed from the well using forceps and rinsed using a wash bottle containing DPBS with Ca++ and Mg++. Rinsing was achieved by filling and emptying each tissue insert for approximately 40 seconds using a constant soft stream of DPBS to gently remove any residual test item. The rinsed tissues were transferred to the second column of 3 wells containing 2 mL of maintenance medium in each well. The rinsed tissues were incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in air for 42 hours.
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
Test item was used as supplied.

The negative control item, Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS), was used as supplied.
The positive control item, Sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), was prepared as a 5% w/v aqueous solution. The positive control was formulated within 2 hours of being applied to the test system.
A 3 mg/mL MTT stock solution was prepared in DPBS. The stock solution was diluted to 0.3 mg/mL with assay medium when required.
A 0.04 N solution of hydrochloric acid in isopropanol was prepared when required.

3.2.1 Negative Control
Information as provided by the Supplier.
Identification:
Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) with Ca++ and Mg++
Batch:
1754643
Purity:
>98%
Expiry Date:
01 February 2019
Storage Conditions:
Approximately 4 °C in the dark
Supplier:
Gibco
3.2.2 Positive Control
Information as provided by the Supplier.
Identification:
Sodium dodecyl sulphate
Batch:
SLBT3991
Purity:
99.5%
Expiry Date:
01 March 2020
Storage Conditions:
Room temperature
Supplier:
Sigma-Aldrich
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Value:
103.5
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid

 Item  Mean OD570 of triplicate tissues  +- SD of OD570  Relative individual tissue viability (%)  Relative Mean Viability (%)  +- SD of Relative Mean Viability (%)
 Negative Control Item     0.934  0.095

 89.0

102.0

109.0

 100  10.1
 Positive Control Item  0.032  0.012

 4.9

2.7

2.7

 3.4  1.3
 Test Item  0.967  0.039

83.8

82.8

90.5

 103.5  9.4

 

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item was classified as non-irritant. The following classification criteria apply:
EU CLP Not classified for Irritation.
UN GHS Not classified for Irritation (category 3 can not be determined).
Executive summary:

Introduction

The purpose of this test was to evaluate the skin irritation potential of the test item using the EPISKINTM reconstructed human epidermis model after a treatment period of 15 minutes followed by a post-exposure incubation period of 42 hours. The principle of the assay was based on the measurement of cytotoxicity in reconstructed human epidermal cultures following topical exposure to the test item by means of the colorimetric MTT reduction assay. Cell viability is measured by enzymatic reduction of the yellow MTT tetrazolium salt (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide) to a blue/purple formazan salt (within the mitochondria of viable cells) in the test item treated tissues relative to the negative controls.

Method

Triplicate tissues were treated with the test item for an exposure period of 15 minutes. At the end of the exposure period each tissue was rinsed before incubating for 42 hours. The test item was found to directly reduce MTT and therefore additional non-viable tissues were incorporated into the testing for correction purposes. At the end of the post-exposure incubation period each tissue was taken for MTT-loading. The maintenance medium from beneath each tissue was transferred to pre-labeled micro tubes and stored in a freezer for possible inflammatory mediator determination. After MTT-loading a total biopsy of each epidermis was made and placed into micro tubes containing acidified isopropanol for extraction of formazan crystals out of the MTT-loaded tissues.

At the end of the formazan extraction period each tube was mixed thoroughly and duplicate 200 μL samples were transferred to the appropriate wells of a pre-labeled 96-well plate. The optical density was measured at 570 nm.

Data are presented in the form of percentage viability (MTT reduction in the test item treated tissues relative to negative control tissues).

Results

The relative mean viability of the test item treated tissues was 103.5% after the 15-Minute exposure period and 42-Hours post-exposure incubation period.

Quality criteria: The quality criteria required for acceptance of results in the test were satisfied.

Conclusion

The test item was classified as non-irritant. The following classification criteria apply:

EU CLP Not classified for Irritation.

UN GHS Not classified for Irritation (category 3 can not be determined).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
5th February 2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
Please refer to the Read Across justification document enclosed in Chapter 13 for further details.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identification:
LME 11311
Batch:
Ua05 (258)
Purity:
99%
Molecular Weight:
292.38 g.mol-l
Physical state/Appearance:
Yellow solid
Expiry Date:
01 November 2023
Storage Conditions:
Room temperature in the dark
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
0.75 mL neat
Duration of treatment / exposure:
10 min
Details on study design:

The undiluted test item was applied for 10 minutes followed by an incubation period of 120 minutes. Negative and positive control items were tested concurrently. The two endpoints, decreased light transmission through the cornea (opacity) and increased passage of sodium fluorescein dye through the cornea (permeability) were combined in an empirically derived formula to generate an In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS).
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
1
Value:
20.1
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Other effects / acceptance of results:
No prediction of eye irritation can be made.
Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
Based on the in vitro irritancy score, no prediction of eye irritation can be made.
Executive summary:

1 SUMMARY

Introduction

The purpose of this test was to identify test items that can induce serious eye damage and to identify test items not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage. The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test method is an organotypic model that provides short-term maintenance of normal physiological and biochemical function of the bovine cornea in vitro. In this test method, damage by the test item is assessed by quantitative measurements of changes in corneal opacity and permeability.

The test method can correctly identify test items (both chemicals and mixtures) inducing serious eye damage as well as those not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage, as defined by the United Nations (UN) Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Items (GHS) and EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) of chemicals (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008), and it was therefore endorsed as scientifically valid for both purposes. Test items inducing serious eye damage are classified as UN GHS and EU CLP Category 1. Items not classified for eye irritation or serious eye damage are defined as those that do not meet the requirements for classification as UN GHS/EU CLP Category 1 or 2 (2A or 2B), i.e. they are referred to as UN GHS/EU CLP No Category.

Method

The test item was applied neat for 240 minutes. Negative and positive control items were tested concurrently. The two endpoints, decreased light transmission through the cornea (opacity) and increased passage of sodium fluorescein dye through the cornea (permeability) were combined in an empirically derived formula to generate an In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS).

Data Interpretation

 IVIS  Classification
 < 3  No category. Not requiring classification to UN GHS or EU CLP
 >3 < 55  No prediction of eye irritation can be made
 >55   Category 1 UN GHS or EU CLP

The In Vitro irritancy scores are summarized as follows:

 Treatment  In vitro Irritancy Score
 Test Item  20.1
 Negative Control  2.1
 Positive Control  114.8

Conclusion

No prediction of eye irritation can be made.

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
5th February 2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
Please refer to the Read Across Justification document enclosed in Chapter 13 for further details.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Identification:
LME 11194
Batch:
Xbm06
Purity:
99%
Molecular Weight:
328.42 g.mol-1
Sponsor Description:
Yellow solid
Envigo Description:
Orange crystalline solid
Expiry Date:
01 January 2022
Storage Conditions:
Room temperature
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
0.75 mL neat
Duration of treatment / exposure:
10 min
Details on study design:
The undiluted test item was applied for 10 minutes followed by an incubation period of 120 minutes. Negative and positive control items were tested concurrently. The two endpoints, decreased light transmission through the cornea (opacity) and increased passage of sodium fluorescein dye through the cornea (permeability) were combined in an empirically derived formula to generate an In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS).
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
1
Value:
4.5
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Other effects / acceptance of results:
No prediction of eye irritation can be made.
Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
Based on the in vitro irritancy score, no prediction of eye irritation can be made.
Executive summary:

1 SUMMARY

Introduction

The purpose of this test was to identify test items that can induce serious eye damage and to identify test items not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage. The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test method is an organotypic model that provides short-term maintenance of normal physiological and biochemical function of the bovine cornea in vitro. In this test method, damage by the test item is assessed by quantitative measurements of changes in corneal opacity and permeability.

The test method can correctly identify test items (both chemicals and mixtures) inducing serious eye damage as well as those not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage, as defined by the United Nations (UN) Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Items (GHS) and EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) of chemicals (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008), and it was therefore endorsed as scientifically valid for both purposes. Test items inducing serious eye damage are classified as UN GHS and EU CLP Category 1. Items not classified for eye irritation or serious eye damage are defined as those that do not meet the requirements for classification as UN GHS/EU CLP Category 1 or 2 (2A or 2B), i.e. they are referred to as UN GHS/EU CLP No Category.

Method

The test item was applied neat for 240 minutes. Negative and positive control items were tested concurrently. The two endpoints, decreased light transmission through the cornea (opacity) and increased passage of sodium fluorescein dye through the cornea (permeability) were combined in an empirically derived formula to generate an In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS).

Data Interpretation

 IVIS  Classification
 < 3  No category. Not requiring classification to UN GHS or EU CLP
 >3 < 55  No prediction of eye irritation can be made
 >55   Category 1 UN GHS or EU CLP

The In Vitro irritancy scores are summarized as follows:

 Treatment  In vitro Irritancy Score
 Test Item  4.5
 Negative Control  0.5
 Positive Control  111.0

Conclusion

No prediction of eye irritation can be made.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on testing conducted on similar substances, no classification or labelling is neccessary. Further information on the Read Across is available in the Read Across justification document enclosed in Chapter 13.