Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Remarks:
only a filtrate was tested.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1967
Report date:
1967

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
eye irritation study
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,9-bis(3,5-dimethylphenyl)anthra[2,1,9-def:6,5,10-d'e'f']diisoquinoline-1,3,8,10(2H,9H)-tetrone
EC Number:
225-590-9
EC Name:
2,9-bis(3,5-dimethylphenyl)anthra[2,1,9-def:6,5,10-d'e'f']diisoquinoline-1,3,8,10(2H,9H)-tetrone
Cas Number:
4948-15-6
Molecular formula:
C40H26N2O4
IUPAC Name:
2,9-bis(3,5-dimethylphenyl)isoquino[4',5',6':6,5,10]anthra[2,1,9-def]isoquinoline-1,3,8,10(2H,9H)-tetrone
Details on test material:
Test materials used in this dossier are all considered to fall under the definition of nano-materials according to the European Commission Recommendation 2011/696/EU as the synthesis and manufacturing of this pigment always yields particulate material with a fine particle size distribution.

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: yellow-silver breed
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Housing: animals were kept in individual cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ALTROMIN K, manufactured by Altromin GmbH in Lage/Lippe
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water

Test system

Vehicle:
other: The pigment was digested in 0.9% NaCl solution tor 1 hour at 40 ºC in a heating cabinet, the amount being 2.5 g in 25 mL NaCl solution. The solution was then filtered off and the aqueous filtrate obtained.
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amounts applied: 0.1 mL

VEHICLE
- Concentration (if solution): pigment was digested in 0.9% NaCl solution for 1 hour at 40 ºC in a heating cabinet, the amount being 2.5 g in 25 ml NaCl solution. The solution was then filtered off and the aqueous filtrate obtained.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
one single application
Observation period (in vivo):
The animals were monitored for any signs of irritation 1, 3, 7 and 24 hours after application.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: none

Results and discussion

In vivo

Results
Irritation parameter:
other: signs of irritation in the ocular mucous membrane
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24 h
Remarks on result:
other: not irritating
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The undiluted filtrate caused no signs of irritation in the ocular mucous membrane.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The undiluted filtrate caused no signs of irritation in the ocular mucous membrane.
Executive summary:

The test article was digested in 0.9% NaCl solution for 1 hour at 40°C in a heating cabinet, the amount being 2.5 g in 25 ml NaCl solution. The solution was then filtered off and the aqueous filtrate obtained. The mucous membrane tolerability was tested by introducing 0.1 ml of the undiluted filtrate once into the conjunctival sac of the rabbit's eye. The animals were monitored tor any signs of irritation 1, 3, 7 and 24 hours after application (Hoechst, 1967). No signs of eye irritation were observed. Therefore, the test item was considered to be not irritating to the eyes.