Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 948-040-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Acute Toxicity: inhalation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 10 August 2017 -
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Study was conducted in accordance with international guidelines and in accordance with GLP. All guideline validity criteria were met.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 436 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity: Acute Toxic Class Method)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Exposure chamber humidity was not kept at 30-70 % in the second exposure. One animal was not weighed at death.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.52 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Exposure chamber humidity was not kept at 30-70 % in the second exposure. One animal was not weighed at death.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- acute toxic class method
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- N,N,N',N'-tetrabutylmethylenediamine
- EC Number:
- 243-678-5
- EC Name:
- N,N,N',N'-tetrabutylmethylenediamine
- Cas Number:
- 20280-10-8
- Molecular formula:
- C17H38N2
- IUPAC Name:
- dibutyl[(dibutylamino)methyl]amine
- Reference substance name:
- Dibutylamine
- EC Number:
- 203-921-8
- EC Name:
- Dibutylamine
- Cas Number:
- 111-92-2
- Molecular formula:
- C8H19N
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-Butanamine, N-butyl-
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- Clear, light yellow liquid
Storage: 2 to 8 °C, in the dark
Expiry date: 01-Jan-19
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- RADIOLABELLING INFORMATION (if applicable)
- Radiochemical purity: N/A
- Specific activity: N/A
- Locations of the label: N/A
- Expiration date of radiochemical substance: N/A
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: 2-8 ºC, in the dark
- Stability under test conditions: Confirmed by GC-MS analysis.
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: N/A
- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium: N/A
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: No
- Preliminary purification step (if any): No
- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: No
- Final preparation of a solid: No
FORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST (if different from that of starting material) : The test item was aerosolized using a metal concentric jet nebulizer (Envigo CRS Limited, UK) located at the top of the exposure chamber. The nebulizer was connected to a glass syringe attached to an infusion pump, which provided a continuous supply of test item under pressure, and to a metered compressed air supply.
TYPE OF BIOCIDE/PESTICIDE FORMULATION (if applicable) N/A
OTHER SPECIFICS: N/A
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Remarks:
- RccHan:WIST
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Envigo RMS (UK) Limited, Oxon, UK
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: Yes
- Age at study initiation: 8-12 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 200-300 g
- Fasting period before study: No
- Housing: The animals were housed in groups of up to three by sex in solid floor polypropylene cages with stainless steel lids, furnished with softwood flakes.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum; 2014C Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Envigo RMS (UK) Limited, Oxon, UK
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-25
- Humidity (%): 30-70 (apart from the second exposure 14 %)
- Air changes (per hr): ≥15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12:12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 21 August 2017 To: 22 January 2018
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- inhalation: aerosol
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- nose only
- Vehicle:
- clean air
- Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD):
- >= 2.11 - <= 2.22 µm
- Geometric standard deviation (GSD):
- >= 2.27 - <= 2.38
- Details on inhalation exposure:
- GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: The test item was aerosolized using a metal concentric jet nebulizer (Envigo CRS Limited, UK) located at the top of the exposure chamber. The nebulizer was connected to a glass syringe attached to an infusion pump, which provided a continuous supply of test item under pressure, and to a metered compressed air supply. Compressed air was supplied by means of an oil free compressor and passed through a water trap and respiratory quality filters before it was introduced to the nebulizer.
- Exposure chamber volume: 30 L
- Method of holding animals in test chamber: During the exposure period, each rat was individually held in a tapered, polycarbonate restraining tube fitted onto a single tier of the exposure chamber and sealed by means of a rubber ‘O’ ring. Only the nose of each animal was exposed to the test atmosphere.
- Source and rate of air: 40 L/hour. Compressed air.
- Method of conditioning air: Compressed air was supplied by means of an oil free compressor and passed through a water trap and respiratory quality filters before it was introduced to the nebulizer.
- System of generating particulates/aerosols: The test item was aerosolized using a metal concentric jet nebulizer (Envigo CRS Limited, UK) located at the top of the exposure chamber.
- Method of particle size determination: The particle size of the generated atmosphere inside the exposure chamber was determined three times during the exposure period using a Marple Personal Cascade Impactor (Westech IS Ltd, Beds., UK).
- Treatment of exhaust air: The extract from the exposure chamber passed through a ‘scrubber’ trap and was connected with a high efficiency filter to a metered exhaust system.
- Temperature, humidity, pressure in air chamber: Temperature: 19-20 ºC; Humidity: 14-41 %; Air Pressure: Not reported
TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Brief description of analytical method used: The actual concentration of the test item was measured by determined by gas chromatography (GC) using an external standard technique. The test atmosphere was sampled after theoretical chamber equilibration and then at approximately 30 minute intervals during the exposure period. Samples were then submitted for analysis.
- Samples taken from breathing zone: Yes
VEHICLE
- Composition of vehicle (if applicable): N/A
- Concentration of test material in vehicle (if applicable): N/A
- Justification of choice of vehicle: N/A
- Lot/batch no. (if required): N/A
- Purity: N/A
TEST ATMOSPHERE (if not tabulated)
- Particle size distribution: The particle size of the generated atmosphere inside the exposure chamber was determined three times during the exposure period using a Marple Personal Cascade Impactor (Westech IS Ltd, Beds., UK). This device consisted of six impactor stages (10.4, 7.7, 4.1, 1.3, 0.90 and 0.56 µm cut points) with stainless steel collection substrates and a backup glass fiber filter, housed in an aluminum sampler. The sampler was temporarily sealed in a sampling port in the animals’ breathing zone and a suitable, known volume of exposure chamber air was drawn through it using a vacuum pump. The collection substrates and backup filter were weighed before and after sampling and the weight of test item, collected at each stage, calculated by difference. The mean amount for each stage was used to determine the cumulative amount below each cut off point size. In this way, the proportion (%) of aerosol less than 10.4, 7.7, 4.1, 1.3, 0.90 and 0.56 µm was calculated.
- MMAD (Mass median aerodynamic diameter) / GSD (Geometric st. dev.): The resulting values were converted to probits and plotted against Log10 cut point size. From this plot, the Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) was determined (as the 50% point) and the geometric standard deviation was calculated. In addition the proportion (percentage) of aerosol less than 4 µm (considered to be the inhalable fraction) was determined.
CLASS METHOD (if applicable)
- Rationale for the selection of the starting concentration: As insufficient data was available on the expected inhalation toxicity of the test item, a sighting test was performed to determine the initial exposure concentration. A group of two animals (one male and one female) was exposed to an aerosol atmosphere of the test item at a target concentration of 1.0 mg/L. Based on the results of the sighting test, a limit test was performed. A group of six animals (three males and three females) was exposed to an aerosol atmosphere of the test item at a target concentration of 5.0 mg/L.
Due to a significant number of mortalities in the Limit Test, a further group of six animals (three males and three females) was exposed to an aerosol atmosphere of the test item at a target concentration of 1.0 mg/L. - Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of exposure:
- 4 h
- Concentrations:
- Mean achieved concentrations:
5.67 mg/L and 1.02 mg/L (test protocol in accordance with OECD TG 436 Annex 3d) - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 3 males and 3 females per test concentration
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing:
Clinical observations- All animals were observed for clinical signs at hourly intervals during exposure, immediately on removal from the restraining tubes at the end of exposure, 1 hour after termination of exposure and subsequently once daily for 14 days. Any deaths or evidence of overt toxicity was recorded at each observation.
Body weight - Individual body weights were recorded on arrival, prior to treatment on the day of exposure (Day 0) and on Days 1, 3, 7 and 14 or at death.
Necropsy- At the end of the 14 observation period surviving animals were killed by intravenous overdose of sodium pentobarbitone. All animals including those that died or were humanely killed during the study were subjected to a full external and internal examination and any macroscopic abnormalities were recorded. The respiratory tract was subjected to a detailed macroscopic examination for signs of irritancy or local toxicity.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight, organ weights, necropsy - Statistics:
- Data evaluations included the relationship, if any, between the animals’ exposure to the test item and the incidence and severity of all abnormalities including behavioral and clinical observations, necropsy findings, body weight changes, mortality and any other toxicological effects. Using the mortality data obtained, an estimate of the acute inhalation median lethal concentration (LC50) of the test item was made
Results and discussion
Effect levelsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- > 1 - <= 5 mg/L air (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Exp. duration:
- 4 h
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- > 1.02 - <= 5.67 mg/m³ air (analytical)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Exp. duration:
- 4 h
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- 2.5 mg/L air (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Exp. duration:
- 4 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: result is based on the cut-off value as determined in Annex 3 of the OECD TG 436
- Mortality:
- 5.67 mg/L group: 3/3 males and 3/3 females
1.02 mg/L group: 0/3 males and 0/3 femlaes
Clinical observations: During exposure both animals exhibited decreased respiratory rate and wet fur. On removal from the chamber both animals exhibited decreased respiratory rate, lethargy, ataxia, hunched posture, pilo-erection, red/brown staining around the snout and wet fur. One hour post-exposure, decreased respiratory rate, ataxia and red/brown staining around the snout were no longer apparent.
On Day 1 post-exposure both animals exhibited hunched posture and noisy respiration was noted in the male. Decreased respiratory rate was exhibited by the male on Day 3 post-exposure. Animals recovered to appear normal from Days 3 to 4 post-exposure. - Clinical signs:
- irregular respiration
- Remarks:
- Decreased respiratory rate and wet fur during exposure. On removal from the chamber: decreased respiratory rate, lethargy, ataxia, hunched posture, pilo-erection, red/brown staining around the snout and wet fur (see above for further details).
- Body weight:
- 5.67 mg/L group: None of the animals survived until the end of the day of exposure and as such no significant body weight data was collected.
1.02 mg/L group: With the exception of one female, all animals showed body weight loss on Day 1 post exposure. Animals showed expected gains in body weight during the remainder of the recovery period with the exception of two males that showed body weight loss or no gain in body weight from Days 1 to 3 post-exposure, one female that showed no gain in body weight from Days 3 to 7 post-exposure and one female that showed no gain in body weight from Days 7 to 14 post-exposure. - Gross pathology:
- 5.67 mg/L group: The following macroscopic abnormalities were detected at necropsy of animals that died or were humanely killed during exposure:
Lungs – hemorrhagic, pale and/or abnormally red.
1.02 mg/L group: No macroscopic abnormalities were detected at necropsy of one animal that survived until the end of the recovery period.
The following macroscopic abnormalities were detected at necropsy of the remaining animals that survived until the end of the recovery period:
Lungs – pale, dark patches, abnormally red, abnormally dark.
Due to the observations noted during the study and at necropsy it is considered that the deaths noted during the study may have been mainly attributable to local toxicity.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 Mortality Data
Mean achieved atmosphere concentration (mg/L) |
Deaths |
||
Male |
Female |
Total |
|
5.67 |
3/3* |
3/3 |
6/6 |
1.02 |
0/3 |
0/3 |
0/6 |
* 1 male killed in extremis due to evert signs of clinical toxicity
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 4 based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- None of the animals died in a group of six rats exposed to a mean achieved atmosphere concentration of 1.02 mg/L. However, all animals died in a group of six rats exposed to a mean achieved atmosphere concentration of 5.67 mg/L. It was therefore considered that the acute inhalation median lethal concentration (4 hour LC50) of the test item, in the RccHanTM : WIST strain rat, should be considered to be > 1.0 – 5.0 mg/L (Globally Harmonized Classification System – Category 4). This equates to an LD50 based on the cut-off value of 2.5 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
OECD 436 (2018) - In an acute inhalation toxicity study, groups of young adult RccHan:WIST strain rats (6 male and 6 female) were exposed by inhalation route to Reaction Mass of N,N,N',N-tetrabutylmethylenediamine and dibutylamine for 4 hours to nose only at mean measured concentrations of 1.02 and 5.67 mg/L. Animals then were observed for 14 days after which time they were sacrificed and underwent necropsy.
Mortality
In the 5.67 mg/L group, all 6 rats were found dead within 102-170 minutes exposure. There was no mortality observed in the 1.02 mg/L group.
Clinical signs
5.67 mg/L group: During exposure all animals exhibited decreased respiratory rate. One animal died after 102 minutes of exposure, two animals died after 120 minutes of exposure. Labored respiration and gasping respiration were also exhibited by two of the surviving animals after 120 minutes of exposure. One animal died after 160 minutes of exposure and a further animal died after 170 minutes of exposure. Ataxia, hunched posture and areas of red/brown staining around the snout were also exhibited by the surviving animal after 180 minutes of exposure. This animal was humanely killed due to the occurrence of clinical signs of toxicity that were considered likely to exceed the severity limit set forth in the UK Home Office Project License after 230 minutes of exposure.
1.02 mg/L group: During exposure, on removal from the chamber and one hour post-exposure, all animals exhibited decreased respiratory rate. On removal from the chamber all animals exhibited ataxia, which was severe in one animal, and there were occasional instances of gasping respiration, labored respiration, noisy respiration, areas of red/brown staining around the snout with isolated instances of clonic convulsions, lethargy and areas of red/brown staining around the eyes. Improvement in the condition of the animals was noted one hour post-exposure.
One day after exposure, all animals exhibited hunched posture and one female also exhibited noisy respiration, pilo-erection and areas of red/brown staining around the eyes.
Animals recovered to appear normal from Days 2 to 5 post-exposure. One male that recovered to appear normal on Day 2 post-exposure subsequently exhibited sneezing on Day 3 post‑exposure. Sneezing was also exhibited by one female from Days 2 to 4 post-exposure.
Body Weight
5.67 mg/L group: None of the animals survived until the end of the day of exposure and as such no significant body weight data was collected.
1.02 mg/L group: With the exception of one female, all animals showed body weight loss on Day 1 post‑exposure. Animals showed expected gains in body weight during the remainder of the recovery period with the exception of two males that showed body weight loss or no gain in body weight from Days 1 to 3 post-exposure, one female that showed no gain in body weight from Days 3 to 7 post-exposure and one female that showed no gain in body weight from Days 7 to 14 post-exposure.
Necropsy
5.67 mg/L group: The following macroscopic abnormalities were detected at necropsy of animals that died or were humanely killed during exposure:
Lungs – hemorrhagic, pale and/or abnormally red.
1.02 mg/L group: No macroscopic abnormalities were detected at necropsy of one animal that survived until the end of the recovery period.
The following macroscopic abnormalities were detected at necropsy of the remaining animals that survived until the end of the recovery period:
Lungs – pale, dark patches, abnormally red, abnormally dark.
Due to the observations noted during the study and at necropsy it is considered that the deaths noted during the study may have been mainly attributable to local toxicity.
None of the animals died in a group of six rats exposed to a mean achieved atmosphere concentration of 1.02 mg/L. However, all animals died in a group of six rats exposed to a mean achieved atmosphere concentration of 5.67 mg/L. It was therefore considered that the acute inhalation median lethal concentration (4 hour LC50) of the test item, in the RccHanTM : WIST strain rat, should be considered to be > 1.0 – 5.0 mg/L (Globally Harmonized Classification System – Category 4). This equates to an LD50 based on the cut-off value of 2.5 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.