Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
other: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1981/08/27
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
non-GLP study is similar to current guideline, but deviates significantly enough to warrant restriction
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE CATEGORY APPROACH
Please refer also to the read-across statement attached in section 13

1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE CATEGORY APPROACH (ENDPOINT LEVEL)
The target and the source substances are structurally similar substances that share the common organometallic core structure consisting of a central zinc metal bonded to four alkyldithiophosphate esters (ligands) by coordinate covalent bonds -Zn[(S2P(OR)2]2. Structural variations between the target and the source substances are related only to the alkyl (R) groups of the alkyldithiophosphate ligands. The substances in this category give thus rise to an (identical) common compound Phosphorodithioic acid moiety that can be released by the breakage of ester bonds and dissociation from the Zinc complex to which the organism would be exposed if the target substance was tested in the toxicity studies. Exposure to the parent compounds (non-transformed constituents) and to the counter alkyl alcohols, possibly released by hydrolysis of P-O bonds – non-common compounds – would not influence the prediction of the (eco)toxicological properties because they are considered to have the same biological targets and to cause the same type of effects through a common underlying mechanism due to the same functional groups (zinc cation, phosphorodithioic cation and aliphatic alcohol anionic moieties). The impurities of the target and the source substances are not expected to impact the prediction because they are identical or, if slightly structural different, belong to the same class of compounds with the same functional groups and their percentages are very low.

2. CATEGORY APPROACH JUSTIFICATION (ENDPOINT LEVEL
The acute toxicity potential of the ZDDP category members is reported to be low (HPV, 2005). The source substances were practically non-toxic in the acute toxicity study with rats (LD50 >3000 mg/kg bw).
Since the main constituents of the target substance are structurally similar to the constituents of the source substances with the same functional groups and the alkyl chain lengths of phosphoroditioate moieties are in the range of the established ZDDP category (C3-C12), the same mode of toxicological action is expected for the target and the source substances. The constituents of the target substance do not possess functional groups associated with other mode of actions or toxicity effects. Toxicokinetic behavior of the constituents of the target substance is expected to be essentially the same as that of the source substance. Based on the results of the oral acute toxicity studies with the source substances and other ZDDP category members, it is evident that the structural dissimilarities – the chain lengths of the alkyl rests – did not result in different strength of the toxicity effects. Even if absorption through GI tract of the category members with shorter alkyl rests and theoretically higher absorption rates (due to the increased water solubility and decreased molecular weights favouring absorption) is higher, their intrinsic properties are essentially the same as the findings in the acute toxicity studies are very similar. The impurities of the target substance are considered not to contribute to the toxicity effects because they are also structurally similar to the impurities of the source substances and consist of substances of simple structure without specific mode of action. Furthermore, their amounts are very low. Therefore, it is predicted that the target substance would possess the same toxicity potential by acute oral exposure as the source substance.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1981
Report date:
1981

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 403 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Minimal detail provided. No histopathology conducted to determine cause of gross pathology findings.
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
other: standard acute method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Phosphorodithioic acid, mixed O,O-bis(1,3-dimethylbutyl and iso-Pr) esters, zinc salts
EC Number:
283-392-8
EC Name:
Phosphorodithioic acid, mixed O,O-bis(1,3-dimethylbutyl and iso-Pr) esters, zinc salts
Cas Number:
84605-29-8
IUPAC Name:
zinc bis[O-(1,3-dimethylbutyl) O-isopropyl dithiophosphate]

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Animals weighing approximately 135 g were supplied by King Animal Labs. Upon arrival, the animals were quarantined to the laboratory for 1 week. Apparently healthy rats were selected for the study. Animals were housed 3/sex/cage and then individually after the exposure period in suspended stainless steel cages. Animal rooms were maintained at 22 °C, 40% humidity, and 12 h light cycles. Purina Rodent Chow 5001 and water were available ad libitum except during the exposure period.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
inhalation: vapour
Type of inhalation exposure:
whole body
Vehicle:
other: unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on inhalation exposure:
A generating system was used to generate concentrated vapor of the test article. An air-vapor mixture was produced by bubbling dry air at 5 L/min through 1 L of test article heated to 66 °C. This vapor mixture passed into the exposure chamber with no dilution air added.
Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
no
Duration of exposure:
4 h
Concentrations:
2.3 mg/L nominal concentration
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
Rats were exposed for 4 h to vapours generated from a single batch of the test article. The projected exposure concentration was not to exceed 15 mg/l. The concentration of the test article in the atmosphere was determined by dividing the quantity for the test article consumed by the volume of air passed through the chamber during the exposure period (nominal concentration). All rats were observed for 14 days following exposure.
Statistics:
not specified

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
> 2.3 mg/L air (nominal)
Exp. duration:
4 h
Mortality:
No animals died following exposure to the test article.
Clinical signs:
other: Diarrhea was noted in one rat following exposure. All remaining rats appeared normal.
Body weight:
All test rats were weighed immediately prior to exposure. Body weights were not recorded following the observation period for comparison.
Gross pathology:
Gross necropsy findings for nine rats were within normal limits. The remaining rat had red foci throughout the liver.
Other findings:
Tan livers and kidneys were observed at necropsy, however, these were not deemed to be treatment related.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this study, the test material did not produce significant toxicity at the nominal concentration of 2.3 mg/l in male or female Sprague Dawley rats.
Executive summary:

In an acute inhalation toxicity study similar to OECD guideline 403 (no GLP conditions), male and female rats were exposed to test substance at a nominal concentration of 2.3 mg/l (vapour) under continuous air flow conditions for 4 h. The LC50 is >2.3 mg/l. Diarrhea was noted in one animal, all other animals appeared normal. Based on the results of this study, the test substance would be unclassifiable in accordance with the classification system of GHS. The LC50 only eliminates Category 1 or 2 classification.This toxicity study is classified as acceptable and satisfies the guideline requirement for acute inhalation toxicity in rats.