Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 609-051-9 | CAS number: 35000-37-4
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 15.01.2008 to 06.07.2009
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP Study report
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
- Report date:
- 2009
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- [2-(tert-butoxy)-2-oxoethyl]triphenylphosphanium chloride
- EC Number:
- 609-051-9
- Cas Number:
- 35000-37-4
- Molecular formula:
- C24H26ClO2P
- IUPAC Name:
- [2-(tert-butoxy)-2-oxoethyl]triphenylphosphanium chloride
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CBA
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- Species: Mouse, CBA strain, inbred, SPF-Quality. Recognized by the international guidelines as the recommended test system (e.g. OECD, EC, EPA).
Source: Charles River France, L' Arbresle Cedex, France
Number of animals: 30 females (nulliparous and non-pregnant), five females per group.
Age and bodyweight: Young adult animals (approx. 9-10 weeks old) were selected. Body weight variation was within +/- 20% of the sex mean.
Identification: Tail mark with marker pen.
Health inspection: A health inspection was performed prior to treatment, to ensure that the animals are in a good state of health. Special
attention was paid to the ears, which were intact and free from any abnormality.
Reliability check: The results of a reliability test with Hexylcinnamaldehyde, performed not more than 6 months previously, are summarized in
the Appendix. Similar procedures were used in the reliability test and in this study.
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, open
- Vehicle:
- propylene glycol
- Concentration / amount:
- 2.5, 5 and 10%
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- other: no challenge conducted
- Vehicle:
- propylene glycol
- Concentration / amount:
- 2.5, 5 and 10%
- No. of animals per dose:
- 5
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- propylene glycol
- Concentration:
- Group(1) animal numbers induction (% test substance)
1 01-05 0% (Propylen glycol)
2 06-10 2.5%
3 11-15 5%
4 16-20 10%
5 21-25 0% (Propylen glycol)
6 26-30 5%
(1) five females each group - No. of animals per dose:
- 30 females (nulliparous and non-pregnant), five females per group.
- Details on study design:
- Initially, three groups of five animals were treated with one test substance concentration per group. The highest test substance
concentration was selected from the preliminary irritation study. One group of five animals was treated with vehicle. Borderline results (SI close
to cutoff value of 3) were obtained for the initial group at 5%. In order to clarify the results at the 5% concentration, an additional group of
five animals was treated with a 5% concentration, along with a concurrent vehicle control group of five animals.
Results and discussion
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks on result:
- other: look to "illustration (picture / graph)
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Remarks on result:
- other: look to "illustration (picture / graph)
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- No skin reactions were observed in any of the animals examined.
In conclusion, the calculated mean Sl values for the substance concentrations 2.5 and 10% did not exceed Sl 2 3. Although the mean Sl value for theinitial 5% test substance concentration exceeded Sl 2 3, this result occurred in the absence of a dose response relationship and was not confirmediin an additional test. Therefore, DCM was considered to be a non skin sensitizer.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
