Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-561-1 | CAS number: 108-21-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin irritation / corrosion
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- For read across justification see the attachment in the read across object attached to chapter 7.4.1 (skin sensitisation).
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
Reference
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- This experiment was specifically carried out to quantify the irritancy of the similar acetate ester ethyl acetate to assess its potential in transdermal drug delivery patches. The work is well reported and carried out to a protocol closely matching OECD 404. The ethyl acetate was not in direct contact with the skin of the test animals (separated by a 50um membrane) but in contrast exposure time was significantly longer than usual
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- , test substance not placed in direct contact (50um semi-permeable membrane separated test solvent from skin) but occlusion should not make this a material difference. Exposure time 24 hours.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Evaluation of cutaneous side effects of transdermal patches delivering the drug levonorgestrel and ethyl acetate as a potential skin penetration enhancer. Test not performed according to OECD protocol but similar methodology used.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Rabbits were individually identified on the right ear using permanent ink marker.
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Elkhorn Rabbitry (Watsonville, CA, USA).
- Weight at study initiation: 2-3 kg
- Housing: individually
- Diet: Purina rabbit chow ad libitum
- Water: uv purified drinking water ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 22±2°C
- Humidity: 40-50%
- Photoperiod: 12 hour light/12hour dark cycle - Type of coverage:
- other: un-occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3-7 patches were placed on each rabbit on new sites over the course of the experiment. Each patch remained in contact with the rabbits skin for 24 hours.
- Observation period:
- 7 days
- Number of animals:
- 4
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: dorsal area
- Type of wrap if used: non-occlusive Keri-towels secured with cloth surgical tape. Test cells were held in place for 24 hours after which another cell was placed in a different place for a further 24 hours. Collars were used on the rabbits.
SCORING SYSTEM: Each test site was subsequently assessed using the Draize scoring method (0 to 4) for erythema and odema at 0, 24, 48 hours and 7 days. The irritation index was calculated (average sum of ethythema and odema across all 4 animals used) Individual scores are not tabulated but results are presented graphically with an indication of variability for ratings or erythema and odema.
OTHER: Microscopic examinations were performed on skin tissues fixed in neutral buffered 10% formalin. Samples were routinely processed, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 um, and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Microslides were examined by light microscopy and the results tabulated. - Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 h
- Score:
- 1.7
- Max. score:
- 8
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: tested using membrane polymer formulation 1
- Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: calculated from 24, 48, 72 hour observations
- Score:
- 1.3
- Max. score:
- 8
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: tested using membrane polymer formulation 2
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Formulation using 100% ethyl acetate as a penetration enhancing solvent produced mild erythema and no oedema, hence its scores are expressed only as a primary irritation index.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: unreliable
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- There are no known reports of levonorgestrel causing irritancy. Some residual irritancy may have been caused by adhesive remaining on the skin following test cell removal. There was also evidence for some contribution to mild irritancy from the membranes themselves. The results indicated that using EtAc-EtOH or neat EtAc in a transdermal delivery device is mildly to moderately irritating to rabbits.
Histological examination showed increased cellularity in the papillary and reticular dermis mile hyperkeratosis and scale crust formation. The histological changes were reversible and consistent with a very mild subacute irritation as suggested by the visual assessment. The conclusion was that use of ethyl acetate in a transdermal delivery device is mildly to moderately irritating to rabbits and would be expected to be non to mildly irritating to humans.
This study is not ideal but is deemed sufficiently reliable to characterise the skin irritancy properties of ethyl acetate. - Executive summary:
A study to examine ethyl acetate as a permeation enhancer solvent for transdermal drug delivery reported mild to moderate irritation to rabbit skin following application of a transdermal drug delivery device containing the drug levonorgestrel and neat ethyl acetate. Control devices containing only water were also found to be mildly irritating. Some residual irritancy may have been caused by adhesive remaining on the skin following test cell removal or the semi-permeable membrane used in the device. Whilst the solvent was not in direct contact with the skin (separated by the 50um membrane), the duration of exposure was significantly longer than required for a guideline study. This study is deemed sufficiently reliable to characterise ethyl acetate as not significantly irritating to the skin.
Two formulations were tested with differing membrane composition but both based on 100% ethyl acetate.
Formulation 1 (membrane 1)
24 hours |
48 hours |
72 hours |
7 days |
|
Erythema |
1.6 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
0.7 |
Odema |
0.7 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
PII |
2.3 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
0.9 |
Formulation 2 (membrane 2)
24 hours |
48 hours |
72 hours |
7 days |
|
PII |
1.5 |
1.3 |
1.0 |
0 |
Maximum Primary irritation index (PII) possible is 8.
Note that the control using water only produced slight irritation, indicating some contribution to overall irritancy from the test membranes.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
Reference
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1987
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Basic data given comparable to guideline study (deviations: occlusive cover); was not conducted under GLP but has sufficient data for interpretation of results.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Diet: commercial available diet, ad libitum
- Water: municipal water, ad libitum - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.5 ml - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4-hour contact
- Observation period:
- up to 10 days after 4 hour contact period
- Number of animals:
- 6 (3 males and 3 females)
- Details on study design:
- READING TIMES: 1 hour, 24 hour, and 2, 3, 7 and 10 days after 4 hour contact period.
SCORING SYSTEM: Method of Draize - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Other effects:
- One animal was found dead at 10 days from unknown causes, but most probably not treatment-related.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: CLP regulation
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study, the substance N-Butyl Acetate was not irritating to the skin according to the criteria of the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
- Executive summary:
A 4 -hour occlusive treatment of 6 rabbits with 0.5 mL of the the substance n-butyl acetate, which is structurally similar to isopropyl acetate, in a study similar to OECD TG 404 did not induce any erythema nor edema, therefore the test item does not reveal any irritating potential under the conditions tested. Such a result would be expected with isopropyl acetate.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
Reference
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- See attached justification below.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
Data source
Materials and methods
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Isopropyl acetate
- EC Number:
- 203-561-1
- EC Name:
- Isopropyl acetate
- Cas Number:
- 108-21-4
- Molecular formula:
- C5H10O2
- IUPAC Name:
- isopropyl acetate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): isopropyl acetate
Constituent 1
Results and discussion
In vivo
Results
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Based on a weight of evidence approach using source substances, irritation is not sufficient to trigger requirement for classification.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.