Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Direct observations: clinical cases, poisoning incidents and other

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
direct observations: clinical cases, poisoning incidents and other
Type of information:
other: Report on a case of eye irritation after accidental exposure to the TS
Adequacy of study:
other information
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Basic data given, acceptable restrictions.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
other: personal communication
Title:
Dimethtylaminoethylacrylate (DMAEA) splash in the eyes
Author:
Elf Atochem
Year:
1994
Bibliographic source:
BASF AG, Werksaerztlicher Dienst, unpublished information, September 1994
Report date:
1994
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
No information
Author:
OECD SIDS
Year:
2005
Bibliographic source:
OECD SIDS, 2-Dimethylaminoethyl acrylate, CAS No: 2439-35-2, 05/2005

Materials and methods

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate
EC Number:
219-460-0
EC Name:
2-(dimethylamino)ethyl acrylate
Cas Number:
2439-35-2
Molecular formula:
C7H13NO2
IUPAC Name:
2-(dimethylamino)ethyl prop-2-enoate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material: Dimethylaminoethylacrylate (DMAEA)

Method

Details on exposure:
A worker was accidentally sprayed on the face with the TS. Some drops reached his eyes when he removed his goggles. The eyes were immediately rinsed with water.

Results and discussion

Any other information on results incl. tables

The worker was immediately sent to the clinic for further treatment. The cornea of both eyes was heavily injured and an opacification of the cornea was visible.

Applicant's summary and conclusion