1. ECHA
  2. About Us
  3. The way we work
  4. Procedures and Policies
  5. Transparency
  6. Cases where ECHA is a party
  7. Registration

Registration

Registration

Registration

This table contains all the court cases closed with a ruling to which ECHA has been a party. Interested parties can easily refer to decisions that may be relevant to them within the scope of ECHA's core activities (REACH, CLP, among others). For some of the cases, there may be a pending appeal or renvoi, which are also listed in the table. The table does not show staff or procurement cases.

The closed court cases have been classified into eight categories:

  1. REACH Candidate List: cases related to the identification of a substance as being of very high concern;
  2. REACH Registration: cases related to the joint submission of data obligation;
  3. REACH Authorisation: cases related to the inclusion of a substance in the Authorisation List (Annex XIV) and authorisation applications;
  4. REACH Restrictions: cases related to the inclusion of a substance in the Restrictions List (Annex XVII)
  5. REACH Evaluation: cases where ECHA has requested information from a registrant under the evaluation procedure (Articles 40, 41 or 46 of REACH);
  6. CLH: cases concerning the harmonisation of classification of a substance;
  7. Biocides: cases concerning biocides;
  8. ATD: cases related to requests for access to documents;
  9. Company size: cases related to company size verification and related charges. 
Related

All the available language versions of the court cases, including those which are pending, can be found at the European Court of Justice website.

  • bg
  • cs
  • da
  • de
  • el
  • en
  • es
  • et
  • fi
  • fr
  • hr
  • hu
  • it
  • lt
  • lv
  • mt
  • nl
  • pl
  • pt
  • ro
  • sk
  • sl
  • sv

 

 

Case number Parties Keywords Main Legal Provisions Procedurally linked cases Date of the ruling
T-805/17 BASF SE v ECHA REACH — Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Article 3(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/9 — Requirement for joint submission of data — Joint submission with possibility of a complete opt-out — Administrative practice of ECHA requiring an agreement on the terms for making a joint submission with the lead registrant for a registered substance — Failure to reach an agreement — Dispute resolution mechanism applied by analogy — Decision granting access to a joint submission — Legal basis —Broad discretion of ECHA — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Legal certainty Article 11 of REACH, Article 3(3) of Implementing Regulation 2016/9 T-806/17 03/10/2019
T-806/17 BASF SE & REACH & colours Kft. v ECHA REACH — Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Article 3(3) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/9 — Requirement for joint submission of data — Joint submission with possibility of a complete opt-out — Administrative practice of ECHA requiring an agreement on the terms for making a joint submission with the lead registrant for a registered substance — Failure to reach an agreement — Dispute resolution mechanism applied by analogy — Decision granting access to a joint submission — Legal basis — Broad discretion of ECHA — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Legal certainty Article 11 of REACH, Article 3(3) of Implementing Regulation 2016/9 T-805/17 03/10/2019